En FRANCAIS ? cliquez ICI

We go, now, speak to you about a point which is major, to understand, today, in these bad times, as would say St. Paul, the situation in which the Roman Catholic Church is since the advent of Jean-Baptiste Montini's reign, the one that was called Paul VI. We want to translate, on the NET, a book published in 1980, wrote by the author Gabrielle Rochon in association with a group of faithful Catholics and she makes, for the occasion, their spokesman and which is entitled:

E-MAIL

Main Menu

UP

An important precision must be made. Very often, we hear people saying to us: " You judge, and Jesus in the Gospel said " : " Judge not, that you may not be judged ", (Matt, VII, v. 1); " you lack charity, it would be better you to keep silent about." Certainly, Jesus, in the said Gospel do not " judge ", but this word of the Divine Master relates to the judgment in " for intern ", that is the consciousness of a person, why a person makes or says such or such thing, the intimate intention which motivates her; on all this, we have no right to carry a judgment, it belongs to God only to judge these things: " I am the Lord who search the heart and prove the reins " (Jér. XVII , v.10). There is, however, a shape of judgment which one can carry, it is the judgment in " for external ", that is words, public acts that a person can make; they fall under the judgment in the " for external "; it is what Jesus learns us when he says: " By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit... Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them. " (Matth. VII, v. 15-20). It is clear, we have to use our intelligence, intelligence guided by the Holy Doctrine of the Church. Let us make a comparison. You walk on the street, and you see John Doe killing a person. In front of this fact, you go at the police station to denounce this person by saying: " I saw John Doe killing a person ". This making, you judged the act; objectively, you can say that this Mr. John Doe committed a murder; what you can not say it is if this Mr. is formally guilty in front of God of man slaughter's sin. Well, this same reasoning applies in the problem which occupies us. I notice that a member of the hierarchy said or makes what the Holy Doctrine of the Church condemned; then, I warn my brothers that Bishop John Smith committed a heresy and that by the behavior, he is so, in a objective way, in the heresy and the schism. What I can not say is if it is voluntarily, involuntarily or by the falsified consciousness that he had such behaviour.

As far as the charity is concerned, nobody misses in the charity when, by linking to the strict truth, he denounces a dangerous situation. If, in a city, you know that anybody, inadvertently or voluntarily, it doesn't much matter, poisoned a source in what people come to drink, under excuse of charity to the person who poisoned the source, you go to let people drink to this source? Obviously not! You go, by charity, to warn the population that this source was poisoned. Well, when it is about souls and the Faith, the same principle applies; one spreads today, by using deceitfully the authority, the deadly doctrines, condemned solemnly and for ever by the Holy Church of Jesus. Charity imposes on every person aware of this fact of preventing those that, deceived with this appearance of authority, drink in these bad doctrines and run by the fact a terrible danger, that of the spiritual death. I believe that every person of willingness will have understood these distinctions.

These things being established well, we kindly request the reader to take note which throughout this brochure, we are going to apply, to carry a judgment in the " for external " in the light of the catholic doctrine, not by hatred or resentment to the persons who are mentioned, but by love for God, the Holy Church and by charity for those that do not realize the terrible violence which is made, today , for the Church of Jesus Christ by those who, occupying and leading Her in a way completely against the will of the Christ, lost any authority on souls.

Certainly, several times, terms can seem violent; well, it is necessary not to forget that it is Jesus who, today, is shamefully scoffed, disdained and trampled by Church's clergymen who, to please the world, abandoned their Lord and Master and delivered to the hands of His enemies, His beloved Spouse, the Roman Catholic Church.

To show you that violent terms can be used without proceeding at all of a bad intention, it will be enough to quote an extract of the book " Liberalism is a sin " of Don Félix Sarda Y Salvany. This book, during his appearance in the 1884's, aroused a general outcry of protests. Sacred Congregation of the Index was brought to cut the question and declared:

"D. Sarda deserves to be praised, because he exposes and defends healthy doctrine on the subject about which it is about, by solid arguments, developed with order and light, without no attack for whoever it is."^1.

Let us see a little of an extract of this book so praised by the Sacred Congregation of the Index:

" The Holy Fathers had doubtless a very net knowledge of the laws of the Christian charity and it is for it that the angelic doctor St. Thomas d'Aquin, at the beginning of the famous opuscule: "Against the opponents of the Religion" represents Guillaume and his sectateurs (which were not certainly condemned by the Church) as enemies of God, Ministers of the devil, members of the antichrist, enemies of the salvation of the human race, slanderers, sowers of blasphemy, outcasts, pervers, ignoramuses, emulators of Pharaohs, worse than Jovinien and Vigilance. "^2.

Wow! Here is enough to convince whoever that, if sometimes expressions are violent, it is because the one who is attacked is Jesus Christ, our Sweet Saviour and that, if one is ardent when he takes His defence, it is normal. I do not see who could blame St. Thomas d'Aquin for this heat and for this passion that he had by defending his Lord.

We kindly request the reader to remember these precisions throughout the reading of this brochure.

The Author.

UP

This brochure was not written by a priest, but by a simple laywoman which makes, for the occasion, the spokesman of a group of faithful Catholics in the Holy Church of Jesus. God, in the infinite Mercy and without any merit of our part, made us the very big grace to see and understand the terrible crisis which shakes the Roman Catholic Church since Vatican II. Having had this inestimable grace, we choose to speak, in front of this unbearable silence, this scandalous indifference which prevails in the Roman Catholic Church since disastrous "reign" of Paul VI. Yes, the time when Paul VI occupied the Seat of Peter was disastrous for the Church, for the Faith and for the souls as we are going to show it farther.

Certainly, it would have been more normal that such a work was made by a priest,because the priests, due to their priesthood and their science, should be the first to get up and to slander all who, consciously or not, propagate or let propagate the heresy and this, whatever is the position that they can occupy in the Roman Catholic Church. The fact of maintaining traditional cult by celebrating the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is not sufficient. It is necessary also to defend the Holy Church of Jesus and we can not claim to be defenders by keeping silent or by hiding. We can not believe that, in all the province of Quebec and particularly in the city of Montreal, there is not a single priest to whom God gave the capacity and the courage to defend Him. God always gives graces necessary for each to carry out the duty of his state. Never God is lacking to anybody and we have the certainty that God gives to every priest necessary graces and courage to carry out this heavy and painful task which is necessary today to every catholic priest worthy of this name. This silence, this indifference do not come from God: " You are the light of the world, neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel "(Matth. V, v.15). Such is the word of Divine Master. Because what is the use for a priest, for celebrating Mass Tridentine if, at the same time, he refuses, by the silence to give Light to souls? Is it possible to see thousands and thousands of souls getting lost in the paths of the protestantisation and having his conscience in peace? Can one claim to have the zeal of souls and, at the same moment, remain indifferent, inactive in front of a situation so dramatic?

" THE PRIEST WHO HAS NO CONCERN OF THE LIFE OF OTHERS, EVEN THOUGH HE WOULD RULED HIS OWN LIFE WELL, HE GOES TO THE HELL WITH THE PEOPLE WHOSE LIFE WAS PERNICIOUS. "."^3.

In front of the current situation, we had the following choice: on one hand, to keep our voice silent, by refusing any compromise with Church's clergymen who, in a unconscious way maybe, betray the Christ, the Church and their mission and deceive souls, under the excuse of the obedience, driving them out of the Catholic Faith; or, on the other hand, to speak, to try, with the grace of God, to inform souls by denouncing all whom, even without realizing it, trample the Christ and his Church and so, risking of being disdained, being persecuted, and to attract to us general condemnation.

In front of God and for God, we chose to speak, not looking for an empty glory, by being faithful to the Christ, because God have given us necessary means and capacity to stand up for Him: to keep silence, for us, would mean to betray our Divine Lord. Indeed, how can one claim to love God, want to serve Him, and not defending Him (when we can), when He is attacked ? If we think well about it, which is the one who could support, without making anything, the one he loved, being scoffed, disdained, and ridiculed? " Greater love than this no man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends. " (John XV, v.13)

That is why, having for a long time prayed and asked God's help, because without Him we can not make anything, we took in front of the Almighty God the decision to write this brochure. We compared the teaching of the Church's clergymen since the Council Vatican II with the traditional teaching of the Church: it is then that raised itself in front of us the INFAMOUS BETRAYAL. Was this treason made consciously? The people who participated in it did they make it voluntarily? We do not know anything about it.

A THING ONLY IS SURE: VOLUNTARILY OR NOT, GOD WAS BETRAYED BY SOULS WHICH HE HAD PRIVILEGED BY CALLING THEM TO THE DIGNITY OF THE PRIESTHOOD.

That God deigns to bless this work. Work makes only for His biggest Glory, and the salvation of souls.

The Author

UP

" To perform the duties of this pastoral responsibility, our predecessors always displayed an indefatigable activity to spread wholesome doctrine of the Christ with all the peoples of the earth, and they took care of it with an equal concern to the pure conservation of it and without change, everywhere where one had received it

...BECAUSE HOLY - SPIRIT WAS NOT PROMISED TO THE SUCCESSORS OF PIERRE SO THAT THEY PUBLISH, ACCORDING TO HIS REVELATIONS, A NEW DOCTRINE,

What happens today in the Roman Catholic Church is terrifying, and it is very important that the reader realizes the gravity of the problem even though, a priori, it can seem to him incredible. A crisis shakes the Roman Catholic Church since Paul VI. In the first times of this crisis, some were able to think that it existed because one did not obey Paul VI and the directives of the Council Vatican II. But after a serious exam of the Council, one is able to notice that this council is the cause of all the disorders and scandalous turnovers which struck the consciousness of so many Catholics. But, will you say, if the council is the cause, why to imply Paul VI and its successors? Exactly because crisis, which began in the council Vatican II, is a crisis of authority.

Paul VI promulgated on December 7, 1965 the document on the freedom of religion. This promulgation had, in itself, to engage infallibility, that of the universal extraordinary magistery (the pope and the bishops reunited in council); now, this statement given for all the Church by Paul VI is heretical and was already condemned by the Pope Pius IX in Encyclical " Quanta Cura ", encyclical which engaged papal infallibility. In front of this fact, in the light of the catholic doctrine, we have to notice that Paul VI was not any more a pope, that he did not possess any more papal authority, when he promulgated this statement, because if he had been a pope, he would have been protected from the error and he would not have been able to promulgate a heretical text. We know that it can seems inconceivable to you, but it is necessary to remain catholic and to judge things in the light of the doctrine of the Church. The first council of Vatican defined papal infallibility; this is a dogma of Faith in which every Catholic has to believe at the risk of being separated from the Church.

Infallibility exercises in the universal common teaching, that is when the pope teaches all the Church by common means: exhortation, preaching, encyclical letter, and in the extraordinary teaching, which is the one that the pope gives only to all the Church by virtue of his responsibility of supreme Pontiff ( this is what we call usually " ex cathedra ") or with all the assembly of the bishops reunited in council. Such is catholic doctrine and one can not oppose to it without arriving at the negation of this dogma. To be catholic, it is necessary to believe in all the truths of the faith, without exception. It is exactly because we believe firmly in all the truths of the faith, taught by the Holy Roman Catholic Church, that we are in the obligation to notice that Paul VI had no more Authority as he promulgated statement on the freedom of religion.

CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IS COHERENT AND CAN NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF; WHAT WAS CONDEMNED BY A POPE AS BEING BAD AND HERETICAL, CAN NOT BE PROMULGATED BY ANOTHER POPE AS BEING GOOD AND ORTHODOX;

JEAN-BAPTISTE MONTINI FELL IN THE HERESY PUBLICLY, AND HE MADE SCHISM, PULLING BEHIND HIM THE MAJORITY OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD.

Those that came after him, more particularly the one that occupies today the Apostolic Seat, can not be considered as legitimate leaders of the Roman Catholic Church. John-Paul II do not stop repeating he only wants to continue to apply the directives of the council Vatican II, to follow the spirit of Paul VI. By doing so, he can not possess papal Authority, because a successor of St. Peter could not want to follow the directives of a heretical and schismatic council. A delicate question arises: Mgr. Wojtyla, being objectively in the schism before his election, as well as those who participated in the conclave, does we have to consider a single moment this election as valid ? For us, we doubt it very much and the reader will understand our doubts having acquainted with the Apostolic Constitution of Paul IV qu'il which he will find in this brochure.

This election valid or not, a thing is clear: Mgr. Karol Wojtyla, by its adhesion to the heresy and to the schism of Paul VI, by its acceptance of the so-called new mass, can not be the leader of the Roman Catholic Church; he can not possess the keys of the Church and at the same time to be separated from it:

" ... THE POPE BY BECOMING HERETICAL STOPS, IPSO FACTO , BEING POPE, AND CONSEQUENTLY, IT IS NOT AS SUCH AS HE IS JUDGED. IN THE CASE THE POPE WOULD BECOME HERETICAL " wrote St. Antonin, archbishop of Florence, " HE WOULD BE, BY THIS ONLY FACT AND WITHOUT OTHER JUDGMENT, SEPARATED FROM THE CHURCH. INDEED, A HEAD SEPARATED FROM A BODY CAN NOT, AS LONG AS IT REMAINS THERE SEPARATE, TO BE THE HEAD OF THIS SAME BODY FROM WHICH IT SEPARATED ITSELF FROM. SO A POPE, WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN SEPARATED FROM THE CHURCH BY THE HERESY, WOULD STOP BY THIS VERY FACT BEING THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH; HE COULD NOT BE HERETICAL AND REMAIN A POPE, BECAUSE BEING SEPARATED FROM THE CHURCH, HE CAN NOT POSSESS THE KEYS OF THE CHURCH."5.

This essential point being established, we believe that it would be convenient to explain to the reader that the major heresy of Vatican II, the heresy which is underlying practically all the conciliar statements, is the heresy of the modernism. This heresy, condemned by the Pope St. Pius X in the encyclical " Pascendi Dominici Gregis " as " the sewer collecting all the heresies ", shows itself under several aspects. One of its forms is the liberalism. The Liberalism was condemned by Pius IX in " Quanta Cura " and Syllabus (as it was again condemned by St. Pius X in " Pascendi "). It is good, we believe, to explain a little what is liberalism and how much grave are its consequences. It will help the reader to understand what occurred in the council Vatican II and why, since then, catholic world fell in such a decay.

The heresy of the liberalism is subtle and to give you an outline of it, we shall use the book " Liberalism is a sin " of Don Félix Sarda Y Salvany. This book unmasks liberalism under all its facets. Don Félix makes a very precise study in the light of the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church:

" In the day of the Presentation in the Temple, the old man Siméon, speaking under the inspiration of the prophetic Spirit, said to the Virgin Mary that her Divine Son would be placed in the world as a sign of contradiction from where would emerge the ruin for a large number and for a large number the resurrection. The character of His divine mission, Jesus Christ passed it to His Church and it is why, from the first times of the Christianity, the heresy attacked the truths of the Faith. Since, this contradiction did not stop, but every century, so to speak, it was transformed, taking a new character as soon as the last error in date had been completely destroyed or unmasked. To speak only about last three centuries: the sixteenth century was dominated by the Protestant heresy; Jansenism tried to pervert the seventeenth and the philosophic naturalism thought, at the eighteenth, of upsetting the foundations of the society. With the residue of all these errors, the nineteenth century had TO BRING US ANOOTHER ONE MORE DANGEROUS MAYBE THAN THE PREVIOUS ONES, BECAUSE IT IS THE MOST SUBTLE, AND BECAUSE IN PLACE TO AIM AT SUCH OR SUCH POINT OF THE DOCTRINE, IT CLAIMED EVEN TO INSINUATE ITSELF INTO THE DOCTRINE TO CORRUPT HER TO THE BOTTOM... IT IS THE LIBERALISM. "^6.

So is defined, in a sense, the liberalism. Yes, really this heresy is of the most subtle, and those that propagate it are several times difficult to identify; it is what explains how the Church's clergymen were able to operate such a doctrinal turnover in the council Vatican II, because not denying any dogma openly, to strive, rather than by-passing them, to empty them like an empty nutshell of their real signification, to manage to establish a new doctrine radically against that of the Roman Catholic Church:

" In the order of facts, it is a sin against divine Commandments of God and the Church because it breaks them all. More clearly: IN THE ORDER OF DOCTRINES, LIBERALISM IS THE RADICAL AND UNIVERSAL HERESY... In the order of facts, it is the universal and radical malpractice of God's law because it authorizes it and it approves all the malpractices... It denies absolute jurisdiction from Jesus Christ on the individuals and the societies... It denies the necessity of the divine revelation and the obligation for every man to admit it if he wants to reach the last end... After this general negation, this negation altogether, liberalism denies every dogma in all or in part, as circumstances show it to him in opposition with its rationalist judgment. So, for example, it denies Faith in the baptism when he admits or supposes the equality of cults... In the order of facts, liberalism is radical immorality. It is what he is because it destroys principle, or fundamental rule of any morality that is God's eternal reason imposing to the human reason: because it dedicates the absurd principle of the independent morality, which is, at the bottom, lawless morality, free morality... Yes, liberalism, in all the degrees and under all the forms, was formally condemned; so that, besides the motives for intrinsic maliciousness which make it bad and criminal, it has against him, for every faithful Catholic, supreme and definitive statement of the Church which judged it such and as such has anathematized it. " ^7.

Here is enough to deprive of whoever the desire to be liberal. How, after this brief outline, to excuse the Church's clergymen who, by perfidious tactics, settled, in place of the doctrine of Our Lord, the heresy of the liberalism, scoffing so, in a scandalous way, the Divine Founder of the Roman Catholic Church?

At these days where we live, in this last quarter of twentieth century, liberalism and modernism became monsters which appear to us as to darken, if it was possible, any trace of the Catholicism of the surface of the earth. We have to fight, with the grace of God, against these enemies of our Faith, because Jesus Christ has already overcome the world (Satan) and it is He who will triumph at his hour. As long as the agitators of heresy, schism and apostacy, were condemned and were disapproved by true popes, make themself guided by the Holy Spirit, which the only concern was to protect integrity and purity of the Faith for the honor was, the glory of God, the salvation of souls and the ecstasy of our Holy Mother the Church, the enemies of Jesus Christ were never able to change Catholic Faith, because then the Church's clergymen, in spite of their human weakness, had God's sense, respect for rites and for sacred laws of the Holy Roman Roman Catholic Church and, especially, they had Authority, what they do not have any more today.

Here is the terrible drama which is happened within the Church of Jesus; those that had to be the guards of the sacred deposit of the Faith, lost any authority on souls, by the bias the council Vatican II, a new Church. This conciliar Church is the perverse fruit of an incredible mixture of all the heresies: liberalism, modernism, Protestantism, etc. Whoever is not with Jesus, can not produce good fruits: " Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abide in the vine, so neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you the branches: he that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing. If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth. "(John XV,4-7)

This change can seem incredible but it is the reality that nobody can deny; any can wonder if we would not have arrived at the end of times? Without wanting to give an absolute answer, we can notice that several things, predicted for the end of the world, seem to have arrived. Jesus, in the Gospel, announces the end of times by these words: " When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand. " (Matth. XXIV, v. 15). But what Daniel predicted and which interpretation did the Roman Catholic Church give to this prediction? We are going, here, to give the explanation of the Cardinal Billot s.j. explanation corresponding completely to the Holy Fathers of the Church and to all the apostolic tradition of the Holy Roman Church:

" What Daniel puts most in evidence for the time of the antechrist and the end of the world, it is the final pursuit which will come down on the Church, and of which that of Antiochus will have been only a weak image. This final pursuit, Daniel characterizes it as a " Time of distress having never had his same in all the suite of the history " " temps quale non fuit ex quo gentes coeperunt usque ad illud. " (Daniel XIII, I)

It is also on this tremendous pursuit that beras the attention of the seer, which asks: " When will have their term, these prodigious things? " And one answers him: " In a time, two times and half of a time; and when the force of the holy people will be completely broken, then everything will waste away. " But Daniel assures that he listened without understanding; he wishes more explicit details, then is made express mention to him of Antichrist, at the same time as is shown the happy term in which, this time, the time of the terrible test being crossed, will succeed sadness. " Go, Daniel, " says the Angel, " because these words are sealed and squeezed until final time. Many will be cleansed, cleared and will be purified with the fire; the godless will act as godless, and none of them will understand; but those that have the science of the devotion will understand. And since the time when will be ABOLISHED PERPETUAL SACRIFICE AND RAISED THE ABOMINATION OF THE DESOLATION, there will be one thousand two hundred and ninety days. Happy the one that will wait and will arrive until one thousand three hundred thirty five days! You, goes to your end and rest; you will stand for your inheritance in the end of days. " (Daniel XII, v. 1-8)

And the Cardinal Billot arrives at three conclusions:

1-" That crisis announced in this Daniel's twelfth chapter will be specially arranged by God as means of purification for the last Christian generation...

2-" We know besides ", he says, " that in the time of the terrible persecution, will be banned any exercise of the true religion, consequently THE CULT OF GOD WILL STOP BEING CELEBRATED, AT LEAST PUBLICLY AND OBVIOUSLY AT LIGHT, AT THE FACE OF the SUN. " A tempore cum ablatum fuerit juge sacrificium " do we read in the eleventh verse. " Since the time when will have been removed perpetual sacrifice. " It is the rehearsal of what was read first (Daniel VIII, v. 13 and XI , v. 31) about Antiochus's persecution with a considerable difference, however, that it is not made any more mention now of the temple, either of the sanctuary, or anything which would have been able to remind a past for a long time and for ever disappeared.

The perpetual sacrifice about which it is a question here, is the SACRIFICE OF THE NEW ALLIANCE which succeeded the one that, according to the law of Moses, was offered in the evening and morning in the temple of Jerusalem and to which, for a thousand more just reason come back the name of " Juge sacrificium ", offered that he is according to the law of his institution, without any break neither day or night, from the rising to the sunset, on all the places and under all the heavens. IT IS, IN BRIEF , THE SACRIFICE OF OUR ALTARS WHICH THEN, IN THESE TERRIBLE DAYS, WILL BE EVERYWHERE BANNED, EVERYWHERE PROHIBIHITED, EXCEPT WHAT COULD BE DONE AND WILL BE IN THE SUBTERRANEAN SHADOW OF CATACOMBS.

3- We know, in third place, that at the same time will be raised the abomination of the desolation: " A tempore cum fuerit juge sacrificium et posita fuerit abominatio in desolationem " (Daniel XI, v. 31)

But what will be, this time, the abomination of the desolation? Obviously something of analogue in what appeared in Antiochus's persecution, when the temple of Jerusalem was dedicated to Jupiter Olympian and defiled by any sorts of impurities and desecrations. Something analogue, let us say, after all, moreover, of the difference of times and of places, and disproportion in a local persecution and in a worldwide persecution when will be that of Antichrist. But what else? SOME NEW MONSTER OF IDOLIZATION ESTABLISHED IN OUR TEMPLES BECOME THE TEMPLES OF THE GOD HUMANITY, OF THE GOD REASON, OF THE GOD IMMANENT TO THE WORLD, TRIUMPHING FINALLY, AFTER SO MANY EFFORTS OF THE FREE THOUGHT, THE GOD TRANSCENDING OF THE CHRISTIAN REVELATION? SOME LUCIFERIAN MYSTERY OF THE DARK CAVES OF THE MASONIC CONVENTS AND INSTALLED IN FULL SUN, IN PLACE AND INSTEAD OF OPPOSITE THE OVERTHROWNED TABERNACLES OF OUR LORD JESUS. " ^8.

Who does not recognize in this upsetting story what happens in the Church of Jesus Christ: the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass subtletly and inequitably forbidden by Church's clergymen, and our churches which became Satan's temples where is celebrated a godless, sacrilegious and heretical cult established by the anti-pope Paul VI. " he that readeth let him understand " (Matth. XXIV, v. 15).

But, will you say, how come that the majority of the Catholics are crossed towards for this godless reform and attend this devilish cult that is the new mass of Paul VI? St. Paul gave us a prophetic answer to this question.

" Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. Remember you not, that when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. And then that WICKED ONE shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him, whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, and in all seduction of iniquity to them THAT PERISH; BECAUSE THEY RECEIVE NOT THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH, THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED. THEREFORE GOD SHALL SEND THEM THE OPERATION OF ERROR, TO BELIEVE LYING: THAT ALL MAY BE JUDGED WHO HAVE NOT BELIEVED THE TRUTH, BUT HAVE CONSENTED TO INIQUITY. " (II-th Epistle of St. Paul Thess. II, v. 3-11)

It is necessary to realize that what happens today is God's just punishment to purify us of our sins, we, who were sometimes so indifferent to the glorious and so adorable Sacrament, when the real cult of God, Auguste Sacrifice of the Mass was celebrated in all his magnificence in all the Roman Catholic Churches.

Today Jesus gives us a chance, to prove Him our love by taking his defence. He, the Almighty, the Almighty King makes us, in its infinite Mercy, the very big grace to let Him prove our faith and our love, by asking us to go to his defence, whatever it may cost us, with the means which are at our disposal even though, often, they are limited!

Let us remember ourselves this word of Jesus:

" Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. " (Matth. X, v. 32-33)

The Publishers(editors)

UP

"The apostolic responsibility, to Us confided by God, in spite of our unworthiness, imposes us general care of the flock of the Lord. To keep it in the faith and to lead it in the way of the salvation, we owe in attentive shephard, take care of ceaselessly and to provide carefully to push aside from the sheepfold of the Lord those that, in our time, delivered to sins, confiding in their own lights, rebel with a rare perversity against the rule of the true faith and falsifying the understanding of the Holy Writings by subtle and vain quibbles, meditate tearing the unity of the Roman Catholic Church and the tunic without sewing of the Lord; if they disdain to be followers of the truth, they do not have to continue to teach error.

I) In front of the current situation so grave and so dangerous, it is not necessary that one can blame the Roman Pontiff for deviating from the faith; he is on the earth the Vicar of God and Our Lord Jesus Christ, he has the plenitude of the authority on nations and on realms, he is the universal judge and has to be judged by nobody on earth.

Moreover, more the danger is big, more the attentiveness must be complete and attentive so that the false seers, or even from other men, entitled in a secular jurisdiction, can take pitifully in their nets the simple souls and drag with them in the perdition and in the ruin of the damnation the uncountable peoples confided to their care and to their direction, to the spiritual as to the temporal; and also that we are never witnesses in the sanctuary of the abomination of the sadness announced by the seer Daniel, while we wish of all our power by means of God, according to our pastoral responsibility, to arrest the foxes who strive to plunder the vineyard of the Lord and to push aside the wolves of sheepfolds, not to look like dumb dogs incapable to bark, either to lose Us with the bad farmers, or to be compared with a hireling.

II) After mature consideration on this subject with our respectable brothers the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, on their council and with their unanimous approval, due to our apostolic authority, We approve and renew all and each of judgments, censorships and punishments of excommunication, suspense, forbids and hardship that promulgated and carried, in any way , against the heretics and the schismatic, all the Roman Pontiffs, our Predecessors - or considered as such - to by their extravagant letters or the Holy Fathers, or the Holy Canons, Constitutions and apostolic Prescriptions. And we want that they are observed in eternity and restored in full power, if need is it, and that they stay.

They are applying to all, up to here, who will have been taken on the fact, will have admitted or will have been convinced to have deviated from the catholic faith or to have fallen in some heresy or to have incurred schism or to have aroused it or committed. They apply also (but God likes to prevent it in his leniency and in his kindness to us) to those that, in future, will go astray either by falling in the heresy or by incurring schism, or by arousing them or by committing them, that one takes them on the fact, that they admit, or that we convince them of it.

WHATEVER ARE THEIR RANK, THEIR STATE, ORDER, CONDITION AND DIGNITY. IN VIRTUE OF THIS CONSTITUTION OURS, VALID FOR EVER, BY HATRED FOR A SO BIG CRIME, THE MOST GRAVE AND PERNICIOUS POSSIBLE IN GOD'S CHURCH, IN PLENITUDE OF OUR APOSTOLIC POWER, WE DECIDE, RULE, DECREE AND DEFINE... THAT SO EVER IT OCCURS THAT A BISHOP, EVEN HAVING OFFICE OF ARCHBISHOP, PATRIARCH OR PRIMATE: THAT A CARDINAL OF THE ROMAN CHURCH, EVEN LEGATE, THAT A SUPREME PONTIFF, BEFORE HIS PROMOTION OR HIS RISE IN THE CARDINALSHIP OR IN THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFICATE, DEVIATED FROM THE CATHOLIC FAITH OR FELL IN SOME HERESY, PROMOTION OR RISE, EVEN THOUGH THIS LAST ONE TOOK PLACE WITH THE UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF ALL THE CARDINALS, IS NULL, NOT HAVING OCCURRED, WORTHLESS, AND WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAY THAT SHE BECAME VALID OR THAT SHE BECOME VALID BECAUSE THE INTERESTED ACCEPTS THE RESPONSIBILITY, RECEIVES CONSECRATION, THEN ENTERS OWNERSHIP OR ALMOST OWNERSHIP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OR THE INAUGURATION OF THE ROMAN PONTIFF HIMSELF OR BY THE WORSHIP (HONORING ON BOTH KNEES) OWED TO BE RENDERED TO HIM OR BY THE PRESTATION OF VERY OBEDIENCE PRODUCED BY ALL OR BY SOME LAPSE OF TIME FOR THESE ACTS: ONE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD IT FOR JUSTIFIABLE IN ANY OF PARTS AND IT DOES NOT CONFER NOR CAN BE SUPPOSED TO CONFER WHATSOVER POWER OF SPIRITUAL OR TEMPORAL ADMINISTRATION TO SUCH MEN PROMOTED BISHOPS, ARCHBISHOPS, PATRIARCHS, OR PRIMATES RAISED TO THE CARDINALSHIP OR TO THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFICATE ALL THEIR SO-CALLED FACTS AND GESTURES,THEIR ADMINISTRATION AND ALL WHICH ENSUES FROM IT HAS NO VALUE AND CONFERS NO AUTHORITY, NO RIGHT TO ANYBODY. THESE MEN SO PROMOTED AND RAISED WILL BE, BY THE FACT, WITHOUT ANY ULTERIOR STATEMENT, DEPRIVED OF ANY DIGNITY, PLACE, HONOR, TITLE, AUTHORITY, FUNCTION AND POWER... "

UP

Since the Council Vatican II, a very grave error skipped into the mentality of the Catholics, that all the religions have the same rights as the true Church of Jesus; that all, without exception, have the right to celebrate their cult in a public way or to propagate their doctrine. This is what we call THE FREEDOM OF RELIGION TO THE "FOR EXTERN".

Before showing that the freedom of religion in " for extern " IS ONE OF THE MOST GRAVE HERESIES OF THE VATICAN II COUNCIL, we believe that it would be useful to bring some precisions.

The Roman Catholic Church is the only one founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ. She is the only one who possesses the Truth, the beloved Spouse of the Christ Jesus, and all the States should normally have to recognize her as the sole and only religion entitled with the legal right of existence, because the leaders of States have no right to make laws or to take measures which damage in any way the divine mission of the Roman Catholic Church, and the public expression of her holy cult. Let us read what the Pope Léon XIII said about the duties of the leaders of States to the Roman Catholic Church:

"There are many to look for the rules of the social life out of the the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. And even, henceforth, the new right, as we call it, and that we claim to be the fruit of an adulthood and the product of a progressive freedom, begins to prevail and to dominate everywhere. But, in spite of so many attempts, it is a fact that we never found, to establish and govern the State, a preferable system to the one that is the spontaneous blooming of the evangelic doctrine... But, whatever is the form of government, all the leaders of States have absolutely to have glance fixed to God, as the moderating sovereign of the world and, in the fulfillment of their mandate, take Him for model and rule... The political society being based on these principles, it is evident that it has to, without failing, carry out, by a public cult, numerous and important duties which unite it with God.... The leaders of States have then to consider Saint God's name and put among THEIR MAIN DUTIES THAT TO FAVOR CATHOLIC RELIGION, TO PROTECT HER FROM THEIR BENEVOLENCE, TO COVER HER WITH THE GUARDIAN AUTHORITY OF LAWS, AND NOT TO RULE ANYTHING OR TO DECIDE WHAT IS AGAINST HER INTEGRITY. And this, they owe it to the citizens of whom they are the leaders. " ^9.

The true Church of Jesus has never recognized to any religion rights, because error in a well ordered society has no right of citizenship, but she always taught that we have to give evidence of a certain TOLERANCE when public peace required it, as Léon XIII said it:

" Indeed, IF THE CHURCH ESTIMATES THAT IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO ASSIMILATE LEGALLY DIFFERENT CULTS TO THE TRUE RELIGION, SHE DOES NOT CONDEMN all the leaders of State who, to reach a bigger good or to avoid a bigger evil, TOLERATE in the practice that each have its places in the country. " ^10.

But never the Roman Catholic Church intervened in the freedom of religion in " for intern " , which mean that she has never prevented whoever from believing in an another doctrine than her, either than she intervened in the practice of the PRIVATE CULT of sects such as Lutherians, Anglicans, etc.; while respecting this freedom in the " for intern ", it has never stopped trying to return to the True Faith all these children separated from her by the error. So, according to all the Holy Apostolic Tradition of the Church, it can there have public tolerance of the " other religions " but it can not be question to recognize them rights, BECAUSE ALL THE RELIGIONS, OTHER THAN CATHOLIC RELIGION FOUNDED BY JESUS, ARE STERILE AND DO NOT POSSESS ANY MEANS OF SALVATION BECAUSE THEY CUT THEMSELVES OF THE TREE OF LIFE, SOURCE OF THE HOLINESS, JESUS-CHRIST SON OF GOD.

Of course, nobody can judge the consciousness of whoever it is, this judgment belongs to God only, but this does not have to prevent us from proclaiming the truth in all its rigour.

" It is necessary to hold " DE FIDE " THAT NOBODY CAN BE SAVED OUT OF THE APOSTOLIC AND ROMAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, THAT THIS ONE IS THE ONLY ARC OF SAlVATION; THE ONE THAT WILL NOT HAVE ENTERED HER, WILL DIE IN THE DELUGE. However it is necessary also to consider as " CERTAIN " that those that suffer from the ignorance of the true religion, if this ignorance is invincible, are not made guilty of this fact with God's eyes. Who could now to pride himself of being able to bound the limits of such an ignorance according to the kind and the variety of the peoples, the regions, the spirits and so many other numerous conditions? When, loosened of our physical links, we shall see God such as He is, we shall well understand by which narrow and magnificent link hold united mercy and divine justice; but as long as we live on the earth, slowed down by this dead matter which blinds the soul, let us hold firmly to what teaches catholic doctrine: " One Lord, one faith, one baptism " (Éph. IV, v. 5). It IS NOT ALLOWED OUR SEARCH TO MOVE FARTHER. ^11.

How to understand that almost the totality of the cardinals, bishops, priests were able to accept conciliar statement on the freedom of religion? This statement is in blatant break with the traditional teaching of the Church. We will here, with the grace of God, try to show to the readers this break and its terrible consequences. In this statement of Vatican II, the traditional teaching was denied on three points:

I - She denies to civil power the right to intervene in religious subject by laws for the benefit of the Roman Catholic Church.

II - She asserts that the freedom of religion, in the for " externe " is a right registered in the nature of the human person and in the divine revelation.

III - She asks that the religious freedom, the absolute right on the religious plan, to be registered in the civil law. ^12.

For the simple believer these points can seem to him unimportant and even acceptable. But, if we compare them with the traditional doctrine which prevailed until the death of The Holiness the Pope Pius XII up to and including, we notice that this conciliar statement is of the most stunning, because it drives to the equality of Churches, cults and to the renunciation of King-Christ and its universal monarchy on the earth.

To understand better this difference, let us compare conciliar statement with the encyclical of Its Holiness the Pope Pius IX " Quanta Cura " 8.12.1864, encycal which engaged papal infallibility.

The conciliar statement of Vatican II says this:

" So, public power, which can not judge internal religious acts, in the same way can not impose or prevent the public exercise of the religion if it is not when law and order requires it. " ^13.

Let us read now the condemnation of Pius IX of such an assertion:

" And against the doctrine of the Holy Writing, the Church and the Holy Fathers, they say that the best condition of the society is that where one does not recognize by power the duty to repress, by legal punishments, the offenders of the catholic religion, if it is not as far as public peace requires it. " ^14.

It is clear, what Vatican II asks for, the Church by the infallible Magistery of the Pope Pius IX solemnly condemned and rejected it; then if it is not of heresy, what it is?

That these Sirs of Vatican deign to show us, in the divine revelation, where our Divine Master says that error has rights, He, who is the Truth and who always severely condemned error, lie and hypocrisy? And Holy Pius X to add:

" Then, if Jesus was good for the misled and the sinners, he did not respect their erroneous convictions, about sincere that they looked; he loved them all to educate them, to convert them and to save them. "^15.

Error has no right for the existence; it must be repressed for the protection of the morality, the protection of souls and the only truth which is in the Catholic Faith.

This madness " of the right for the freedom of religion ", in the public exercise of all the cults, John-Paul II resumes it in its encyclical " Redemptor Hominis ", this encyclical which is not catholic, filled with equivocity, with false ecumenism and with a false conception of the Redemption. But let us read this text of the follower of Paul VI:

" That is why THE CHURCH OF OUR TIME grants an importance for all that the Council of Vatican II exposed in its statement on the freedom of religion, as well in the first part of the document as in the second... Among these rights, counts RIGHTLY THE RIGHT TO THE FREEDOM OF RELIGION, BESIDE WITH THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE. " ^16.

Let us read now the voice of the wisdom, guided by the Holy Spirit, giving us teaching based on all the apostolic tradition of the Holy Church:

" OF THIS SOURCE POISONED BY THE INDIFFERENCE, ENSUES THIS FALSE AND ABSURD MAXIM OR RATHER THIS FRENZY: WE MUST GET AND GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, ERROR OF THE MOST CONTAGIOUS, which levels the way of this absolute freedom and without brake of the opinions which, FOR THE RUIN OF THE CHURCH AND THE STATE, GOES SPREADING EVERYWHERE AND OF WHICH CERTAIN PEOPLE, BY AN EXCESS OF IMPUDENCE, ARE NOT AFRAID OF REPRESENTING AS ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE RELIGION. " ^17.

It is necessary to be blind not to see difference between these two teachings. Gregory XVI speaks with love and wisdom, guided by the Holy Spirit, in the only purpose to protect the Church of Jesus and the souls of the pernicious contagion of the heresy.

John-Paul II, this man sat illegitimately on the Seat of Holy Peter, speaks about a language filled with liberalism, his language is not that of Jesus, but that of the devil; because the devil is the father of the lie, the ambiguity and tries only to loose souls by exposing them to any sorts of abnormalities. Souls attached to Jesus and to the truth do not recognize in the voice of John-Paul II that of the Good Pastor. It is an infamous treason that to look as a demand of the Roman Catholic Church that the right, in " for extern ", for the freedom of religion to be registered in civil laws(proposition condemned in "Quanta Cura"). Never the Holy Roman Roman Catholic Church would have made such a demand, and this proposition denies the duties of the governments to Jesus and its Church.

It is, in fact, to deny the universal Monarchy of, to lower King-Christ at the same level as all these false seers who made so much evil for souls through centuries!

Only the Lord deserves honoring and to Him only belongs universal monarchy and all the people must be subjected to him. To deny the monarchy of Jesus is, in fact, an apostacy. Pius XI said this:

" The holiday of King-Christ gives us the deepest hope to hasten the return so desirable of the humanity to his so beloved Saviour. A celebrated holiday every year in honour of King-Christ will be supremely effective to incriminate in any way this apostacy so disastrous for the society... we cover with a heavy silence the very pleasant name of our Redeemer; the more this behaviour is despicable and higher have to go up our cheers, the more the statement of the rights must be propagated that confer on the Christ its dignity and his royal authority... " ^18.

The Roman Catholic Church has never forced anybody to adhere to the Catholic Faith (cf. Canon law 1351). Her attitude, in front of those that are separated from Her, was always that of a loving mother which had no other purpose than the salvation of her children remote from Her. Even when She launched excommunications or other condemnations or which She asked that error is austerely repressed, it is the love of the truth and of souls which guided her.

The Church of the Christ has, today, the face horribly deformed by iniquitous Church's clergymen who, by perfidious tactic, gave her the face of a pervese mother who, under the excuse of charity and love, refuse to give light to souls, leaving them in the spiritual death, not stopping demanding the freedom of cults and the freedom of conscience for all the religions.

Every Catholic worthy of this name can not remain passive and watch these people dragging the Christ in the mud by saying, it is not our responsibility!

We have no right to act so, we have to fight of all our forces so that these people who occupy the Church of Jesus are thrown outside.

No! The face of the conciliar Church does not reflect the one of Jesus Christ but that of Satan because it reflects the spiritual death. Let this be well understood: error should never possess rights. Any society, any law must be ordered with the aim of the heavenly good; such is and will always be the doctrine of the true Church of Jesus. St. Thomas D' Aquin writes:

" As (by the God's free kindness) the present life in which we have to " live well " has for the end heavenly bliss; it is up to the public authority to get the good life of the multitude, in a way which is convenient for the obtaining of the heavenly bliss; for example to prescribe (in the temporal order) what leads to this bliss and to forbid, as much as possible, what would be there opposite " ^19.

All which is except the Catholic Faith can not lead to this heavenly bliss.

To all the Church's clergymen who laud the heretical doctrine of Vatican II on the freedom of religion the Lord says:

" But woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men, for you yourselves do not enter in; and those that are going in, you suffer not to enter. "

(Matt. XXIII,13)

UP

" THE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH BELIEVES, PROFESSES AND PREACHES FIRMLY THAT NONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE OUTSIDE ON THE CHURCH - THE JEWS, THE HERETICS AND THE SCHISMATIC QUITE AS THE HEATHEN - CAN HAVE PART IN THE ETERNAL LIFE; BUT THAT THEY WILL ALL GO TO THE ETERNAL FIRE, ' WHICH WAS PREPARED FOR THE DEVIL AND HIS ANGELS. ' (Matt. XXV , 41) UNLESS BEFORE THE END OF THEIR LIFE THEY ARE REUNITED IN HER ... THAT NOBODY, WHATEVER IS THE QUANTITY OF THE ALMS, AND HE HAD EVEN POURED HIS BLOOD FOR THE NAME OF THE CHRIST, CAN BE SAVED, IF HE DID NOT STAY IN THE BOSOM AND THE UNITY OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. "^20.

After having read this text, what to think, then, of the false conception of the ecumenism which was settled down in the post-conciliar Church? Already conciliar statements had begun to falsify the sense of the ecumenism and, after the council Vatican II, Paul VI pushed the arrogance up to ask forgiveness for the other religious confessions of the errors which the Roman Catholic Church had committed to them; and what to say of this stunning gesture that he made by kissing the feet of the schismatic patriarch Athenagoras by asking him for forgiveness!

John-Paul II does not make so better, full of the mentality of his Master Paul VI. In the encyclical " Redemptor Hominis ", he urges the members of the Roman Catholic Church to adhere to this luciferian ecumenism which has only a single purpose: to destroy the Church of Jesus and make her to abandon her mission to convert all what got lost in the heresy and the schism, and to return them to the true faith, the catholic faith such as she was always taught until the death of the Holiness the Pope Pius XII.

For a better understanding, it will suffice to set the conciliar doctrine of John-Paul II against that of the Traditional Church. John-Paul II in the encyclical says this:

" What to say about all the initiatives aroused by the new oecumenical orientation. Unforgettable John XXIII, with an evangelic light, put the problem of the union of the Christians... The Council of Vatican II answered this requirement, under a concise shape, by the decree on the ecumenism. The Pope Paul VI, leaning on the activity of the secretariat for the unity of the Christians, made the first difficult steps on the road of the realization of this unity. Did we go far enough on this road?... Real oecumenical activity means opening, coming together, availability in the dialogue, the common search for the truth in the completely evangelic and Christian sense... Activity which aims at the coming together with the representatives of the non-Christian religions which expresses itself by the dialogue, the contacts, the prayer in common... IT DOES NOT HAPPEN SOMETIMES THAT THE FIRMNESS OF THE FAITH OF NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS - EFFECT ALSO OF THE SPIRIT OF the TRUTH -....aiming at the mutual knowledge and at the abolition of the obstacles which are on the way of the perfect unity. " ^21.

Let the reader forgives us for this long and boring quotation but it was necessary to make it. You noticed, no doubt, this execrable blaspheme against the Holy Spirit: " non-Christian Religions - effect also of the Spirit of the truth ... aiming at the mutual knowledge and at the abolition of the obstacles which are on the way of the perfect unity. " Lie! Non-Christian religions and all the religions others than catholic religion, are not effects of the Holy Spirit, but the devilish spirit. Because, how can the Holy Spirit be at the same moment the truth and the lie, and how could He be the author of the idolization, abominable sin with God's eyes, who is itself in certain non-Christian religions? Cursed blasphemy under the pen of this anti-pope.

Let us read now the brilliant teaching left to us Pius XI:

" Some entertain the hope that one could easily bring the peoples, in spite of religious differences of opinion, to unite in occupations of certain doctrines admitted as common foundation of spiritual life. As a consequence, they hold congress, meetings, conferences frequented with a rather considerable number of auditors; they invite to discussions all the people unclearly, the unfaithful of any category, the believers and until those who have the misfortune to have separated themselves from the Christ or that deny piercingly and stubbornly the divinity of his nature or his mission. SUCH EFFORTS HAVE NO RIGHT FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE CATHOLICS, BECAUSE THEY LEAN ON THIS ERRONEOUS OPINION THAT ALL THE RELIGIONS ARE MORE OR LESS GOOD AND PRAISEWORTHY... BESIDES THAT THEY LOOSE THEMSELVES IN THE ERROR, THE UPHOLDERS OF THIS OPINION REPEL AT THE SAME MOMENT THE TRUE RELIGION: THEY FALSIFY THE NOTION OF HER AND OVERTURN BIT BY BIT INTO THE NATURALISM AND THE ATHEISM. IT IS EVIDENT SO PERFECTLY THAT IT IS TO ABANDON THE DIVINELY REVEALED RELIGION TO JOIN THE PARTISANS AND PROPAGATORS OF SUCH DOCTRINES. A false appearance of good can more easily, while it is a question of favoring the union of all the Christians, carry away some souls... UNDER THE SEDUCTIONS OF THE THOUGHT AND THE CARESS OF WORDS SKIPS AN ERROR UNMISTAKABLY OF THE MOST GRAVE AND CAPABLE OF RUINING FROM TOP TO BOTTOM THE CATHOLIC FAITH. The consciousness of our apostolic responsibility forbids us to allow that pernicious errors come to mislead the flock of the Lord. " ^22.

Certainly that you saw the difference of the two teachings. What always wished the Roman Catholic Church is return to the true faith of its children misled far from her in the paths of the heresy and the schism, but never the Holy Church wanted to abandon an iota of her divine doctrine to please and to attract; because only she possesses the truth and it is for the other religions to change, to abandon their errors and to return in the Roman Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ.

What proposes John-Paul II to the Catholics it is no more and no less to give up their faith, to dilute dogmae under excuse of charity and unity.

We believe that it would be useful to show what we say by the following two facts that you will have no difficulty to understand.

In the delivery of April 10, 1977, the "Montréal-Matin" published a communiqué of the Judeo - catholic International Committee gathered in Venice and which brought back two important appreciations.

This communiqué, handed to the press by Holy See, stated a statement of the great rabbin of Rome, Elio Toaff, who was delighted of " the important step forward ". Here is the statement which he made by basing himself on the statements of the Judeo - catholic International Committee:

" REJECTION BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF ANY SHAPE OF PROSELYTISM (CONVERSION) TOWARDS RESPECT OF THE JEWS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF THE COMMUNIQUÉ. It is certainly susceptible to create new connections between the Church and Judaism. " ^23.

And all the Italian observers were able to only interpret the communiqué in the same sense:

" A DEFINITIVE ABANDONMENT BY THE CHURCH OF ANY CONVERSION'S ATTEMPTS OF THE JEWS. "^24.

Here is the conciliar ecumenism stemming from Vatican II, treason of the first mission of the Church of the Christ according to the order of the Divine Master:

" Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you ... "

(Matt. XXVIII,19-20)

This ecumenism, this conciliar Church and its members are not catholic any more! Which bigger evil were could we make to the Jews except that to give up giving them light: Jesus Christ who is the only one who can save them? To act so, is to deny the Christ, is to leave the Jews in darkness and in their merciless hatred that they have against Jesus Christ, Son of God, Messiah announced by the seers and Redeemer of the world whom they always refuse to recognize.

Here is another example which will serve to explain to the reader that this kind of ecumenism does not bring the other religions to the true catholic faith but show that it is the Church's clergymen who abandon their faith to adapt itself to the other religious confessions, pulling in their suite the souls by a blind obedience.

Let us see what " our bishops " are doing. The international commission between the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican religious community came to an agreement but in this agreement, the statement on the Eucharist is completely unacceptable. In this statement signed by Bishop Emmett Carter, doctrine and catholic faith are scoffed. He says this:

" It can not there have of rehearsal of this sacrifice, or addition in what the Christ carried out once for everybody. No attempt made to express a link between the sacrifice of the Christ and Eucharist has to darken this fundamental fact of the Christian faith. "^25.

And throughout this statement, they chose ambiguous expressions better to deceive and to sow doubt notably: " Memorial of the death of the Christ "

Now pemit us to quote you, compared to this text, true catholic doctrine so well defined in the Holy Council of Trent:

" There is only one and only victim whose immolation is renewed every day in Eucharist... August Sacrifice of the Mass is not only a sacrifice of praises and actions of graces, or a simple memorial of The one that was offered on the cross, but (also)(encore, in French) a true sacrifice of propitiation... because all the merits so plentiful of the bloody victim spread on us by this non-girthing sacrifice ...Jesus established Eucharist so that the Church has a perpetual sacrifice. " ^26.

Where did Bishop Emmett Carter and, with him, all the bishops of Canada take this teaching that there was no link between the sacrifice and Eucharist? Certainly not in the traditional doctrine of the Church but very well in the Protestant theology. These bishops became propagators of the error and the murderers of souls.

Here is an example of the beautiful work of the post-conciliar ecumenism; here are his fruits: treason, heresy, schism, scorn of Jesus and his Gospel under the cover of this chimera that is the creation of an universal religion; ideology which implies inevitably the destruction of the Roman Catholic Church such as the Christ founded her and such as the Popes governed her until Pius XII's death.

And you, are you ready, do you feel ready to deny Jesus, to apostatize your faith? Are you so sure that, who behave in a absurd and scandalous way, are assisted by the Holy Spirit? Should not owe think about it profoundly because your salvation, and that of your children, can depend on the attitude that you will adopt in front of this shameful denial of the Church's clergymen.

" If one takes place in the point of view of facts, Jesus Christ did not establish or formed a Church which would include several communities of similar kind, but different and not connected by these links which can make the inseparable and only Church according to the mode of which we proclaim in the symbol of the Faith: I believe in the Church... one... So, when Jesus Christ speaks about this mystic building, he mentions only a single Church, that he calls his: ' I will build My Church ' (Matt. XVI , 18). Whatever other Church which we would imagine except that one, not being founded by Jesus Christ, can not be the real Church of the Christ... The Church of the Christ is then unique and perpetual, all the one who part from her, get lost far from the will and the order of the Christ Our Lord. They leave the road of the salvation and go to their loss. " ^27.

UP

An observation is necessary: since the dark day when Paul VI sits on the Seat of Peter, destruction began. This enigmatic man that was Jean-Baptiste Montini, who had been pushed aside from Vatican by Pius XII to have, without him knowing, begun negotiations with Moscow, chaired, calculated and ordered coolly the destruction of the Church of Jesus by his mad cult of the man to the expense of God, his innovative spirit, his liberalism, his masonic humanism and his pro-communist attitude. The reform of Paul VI ensues not from the infallible Tradition of the Church but, in fact, from the liberalism, the masonic humanism and the modernism, so many ideologies condemned by the infallible magistery of the true successors of Peter.

Let us show now what is this sad inheritance which Paul VI left and which John-Paul II tells to want to assume.

" THE CRIME OF THE MODERN AGE IS TO SACRILEGIOUSLY WANT TO SUBSTITUTE THE MAN FOR GOD "^28.

On September 23, 1963 Paul VI said:

" We do not want to make of our faith a motive for debate with our separate brothers. "^29.

" Religious wars are finished for ever. "^30.

It is an insult to all the Holy Pontiffs who began crusades, holy wars for the defence of the Holy Catholic Faith, and towards all the martyrs who, for their faith, shed their blood, all the saints who fought heresies with courage.

If Paul VI did not want to defend Catholic Faith, if he did not want to protect the deposit of Faith which had been confided to him; then of which right was he the head of the Church, if he was ready for the most guilty compromises, in front of enemies of the Christ and his Church? Nothing or anybody stopped this man; almost all the cardinals, the bishops, priests sank into a guilty silence; silence which equal a shameful treason of their mission. But Paul VI was only at the beginning of his devilish work. Read this terrible speech which is no more and no less than an apostacy:

" The Church of the Council, it is true... took charge a lot of the man, the man such as really he appears at our time, the alive man, the man completely busy about himself, the man who makes himself not only the centre of all which interests him but which dares to claim himself principle and last reason of any reality... "

" Laic and profane humanism finally appeared in its terrible stature had, in a sense, challenged the Council. Religion of the God who make Himself a Man met with the religion (because it is a religion) of the Man who makes himself God. What did arrive? A shock, a fight, an anathema? It could arrive; but it has not took place. The old history of the Samaritian was the model of the spirituality of the Council. An unlimited sympathy invaded it quite completely. The discovery of human necessities - and they are all bigger as the son of the earth makes bigger - absorbed the attention of the Synod. Recognize him at least this merit, you, modern humanists who give up the transcendence of the supreme things and know how to recognize our new humanism: WE ALSO, MORE THAN WHOEVER HAVE THE CULT OF THE MAN. "^31.

We hardly believe that he dared to pronounce such a blasphemy; cult of the man, love for the man who makes himself God; he went as far even as composing a blasphemous hymn to the man his god, modelled on the hymn of Christ-King. See, read attentively this blasphemous hymn in the mouth of this impostor:

" Honor to the man, honor in the thought, honor in the science, honor in the technique, honor in the work, honor in the human boldness; honor in the synthesis of the scientific activity and the sense of the organization of the man which, unlike the other animals knows how to give to his spirit and to his manual ability instruments of conquest; honor to the man, the king of the earth and today prince of the sky. "^32.

Forgiveness ô Holy Christ-King for this blasphemy; forgiveness for this abominable treason; forgiveness for all these priests who, in their guilty cowardices, did not get up to say to this inequitable man: " Honor to Jesus, King of the sky and the earth; honor in Christ-King; honor in our Divine Saviour; honor and glory are returned to Him on all the area of the earth. "

But, for Paul VI, Christ-King was not any more anything except that an obstacle in this anti-catholic utopia which was his, the meeting of all the people in " love and brotherhood. " Read this speech which it pronounced on August 9, 1970 about the Middle East:

" Conflict engages three ethnico-religious expressions which recognize all an unique and true God: the Hebraic people, the Islamic people and, in the middle of them, spread all over the world, the Christian people.

It is about three expressions which profess an identical monotheism, by these three ways the most authenic, the most former(old), the most historic and even the firmest and the most convinced. Would not it be possible that God's name, instead of irreducible oppositions, engenders a feeling of mutual respect, possible agreement, peaceful coexistence? Reference to the same God, to the same Father, without prejudging theological discussions, it could not one day be of use to the discovery so evident, but so difficult and so indispensable, that we are a son of the same Father and that we are then all brothers. "^33.

Here is Jesus Christ pushed aside from the lapel of the hand, denied, relegated to the plan of theological discussions. But, rather, let us this holy Pope Pius X answer such a proposition:

" Strange, terrible and depressing at the same moment are boldness and thoughtlessness of spirit of people who call themselves catholic, who are dreaming of melting the society in such conditions and establishing on the earth, on the top of the Roman Catholic Church, " the reign of the justice and the love " with workers come from everywhere, of any religions either without religion, with or without faith, providing they forget what divides them: their religious and philosophic conviction, and that they put in common what unite them: a generous idealism and moral strength taken " where they can ". We are frightened... The result of this promiscuity at work, the beneficiary of this cosmopolitan social action can only be a democracy which will be neither catholic, nor Jew, nor Protestant; a religion more universal than the Roman Catholic Church, reuniting all the people, finally became brothers and companions in " God's Kingdom. " We does not work for the Church, we work for the humanity... It is an organized apostacy. " ^34.

And whoever adhere with aknowledgement to this ideology does not he make himself guilty of apostacy and schism to the God's Holy Church and her Divine Spouse Jesus Christ, Son of God?

Let us continue, let us go down even more deeper in this infernal abyss! Do not close this brochure! Does reality begin to shiver you, to raise itself in front of you in all its monstrousness? Continue to read, because you have it already too much read to stop without taking in front of God a terrible responsibility!

You ignore for sure that the Roman Catholic Church, before Paul VI, did not know how to announce any more the Christ to the world; that the bridge between the Church and the people was cut; that yourselves, your relatives(parents), roughly twenty years ago, were in the spiritual blackness. Let Paul VI teach you:

" Council gave to the Church a big and difficult instruction, that to restore the bridge among her and the current man... It supposes at least that, for the moment, this bridge does not exist or is very little practicable, or collapsed completely. If we think well about it, this state of things represents a terrible and immense historic drama, social and spiritual; it means that, in the current state of things, the Church does not know how to present any more the Christ to the world in a manner and in a sufficient measure.^35.

Execrable blasphemy against the Holy Spirit because if the Church, before Paul VI, did not know how to announce the Christ to the world, it is so that during centuries Holy Spirit would have been lacking to his Church and that the people roamed in darkness spiritual; to accept such an idea it is to give up being catholic.

Luther, an heretic condemned by the Church, author of a schism and responsible for the deviation of several thousand souls, personage who loathed August Sacrifice of the Mass; he, this instrument of the devil, received from the conciliar Church only praises!

Read all these absurd statements! Osservatore Romano (official newspaper of Holy See) relates, without uttering any comment or rectification, this statement of the Swedish delegate in the laic congress:

" Liturgical reform made one considerable step forward about the oecumenicity and it came close to liturgical forms of the Lutherian Church. " ^36.

But, will say to yourselves, maybe this Swedish is not in authority in the Church. We know it and, to prove that this layman did not make a mistake, read the statement of the correspondent of Paul VI, Cardinal Willebrands to the World Lutherian Assembly to Évian, in July 1970:

" A more just appreciation of the person and Luther's work is necessary...Did not Council Vatican II itself welcome requirements which had been, among others, expressed by Luther and by whom many aspects of the Christian Faith express themselves better at present than previously? Luther made, in a extraordinary way for his time, the point of departure of the theology and the Christian life. " ^37.

O you, Eminence, which had been raised to the dignity of the priesthood, you, " the salt of the earth ", why these scandalous words? Did you forget that you have to be the defender of the Christ and his Church? Then say to us why you became such an enemy of the Christ because, by exciting the person and Luther's work, it is the devil that you excite and the Christ whom you deny!

By this scandalous speech of the Cardinal Willebrands here is Luther rehabilitated. Maybe we shall assist a day its canonization by " the conciliar Church " and the excommunication of the pope which had solemnly condemned him!

And the list of misdeeds could lengthen in a almost indefinite way. Under Paul VI, the worst heresies and scandals spread without being ever condemned. Cardonnel, Schillebeck, Six (protégé of Paul VI), Kung, Besret, Hourdin, Léon-Dufour, etc.; as much of heretics as it would have been necessary to condemn but what Paul VI protected better to murder souls.

UP

""Pie, bishop, servant of the servants of God promulgates this document with the approval of the Holy Council (Vatican I) so that he is kept for ever ."

Preparation and usage of an unique catechism for the Catholic Church

" Our Holy Mother the Church, educated by rules and examples of her Spouse, Our Savior Jesus Christ, always showed a care and a particular solicitude towards the children, so that fed with the milk of heavenly doctrine, they are formed early in any practice of the devotion. That is why the Holy Council of Trent did not restrict itself to recommend to the Bishops to take care that we teach diligently to the children the rudiments of the faith and the obedience to God and their parents (Council of Trent Sess. XXIV ch. 4. De reform.), he has still estimated that he had to fix a rule or a method to educate the Christian people from these rudiments of the faith, method that should follow, in all the churches, all whom would fall legally the offices of minister and doctor... So that henceforth we observe everywhere a one and only way of teaching and of learning doctrine, he approved a small catechism intended for the instruction of the children... It will be up to the Bishops to compose textbooks for the catechesis more developed to complete their instruction and to refute the errors which could rage in their region... Finally, as it is not enough to teach by heart the faithful the formulae of catechism but as it is advisable to add to it verbally explanations adapted to the intelligence of each... we observe a common rule and a method to pass on the truths of the Faith. " ^38.

Now, what can we say of the Dutch catechism, the catechesis of France, Italy, Germany, the United States and Canada, yes, you read well: of Canada and the Province of Quebec! Maybe did you think of being shielded from this contagion, but not? They are your children that we poison; these innocent souls are delivered to the hands of the murderers with the cooperation of your guilty indifference, consciously or not.

You do not believe us? Well, let us show you what we teach to your children. Take for example volume no 2 : " Let us celebrate his miracles ", the no 3 " Gathered in love "

You will find there sentences of this kind:

" Why do the Christians gather at the mass? The Christians gather to listen to God's word, to praise the Father with Jesus, to share the Bread of Life. "

" Mass is the sacrifice of action of graces of the quite complete Church, its leader Jesus and of its members. "

" Mass is a festive meal in honour of resuscitated Jesus. "

Here is heresy in the pure state; mass is not a feast, mass is the not bloody renewal of the sacrifice of the Cross where our Divine Saviour sacrifice himself in a not bloody way in propitiatory victim for our sins and to calm the just anger of his Father.

But to go with " the conciliar Church " it is necessary to inculcate in these young people a new conception of the mass to make them later true Protestants.

And see the subtle negation of the Sacrament of the Order:

" The Christians redo the meal of the Lord to be faithful in the command which it gave to them: Make this in memory of me. "

No more priesthood, no more priests, but simply Christians without distinction who redo the meal of the Lord; here is the Protestant theology.

To please the Protestants, not to strike them in this heretical catechesis, dogmae are scoffed. It is a must, indeed, the satanic ecumenism of Vatican II is today more important than the Catholic Faith!

You see, tomorrow your children will not be Catholics but Protestants soaked by a liberal mentality and who, under excuse of freedom, will refuse to obey you!

Catholic parents, do you realize the huge responsibility which you take in front of God by accepting that these innocent souls, the children that God confided you to make them his elected members, are dying poisoned with all these heresies?

Still it is time to react. Demand that your children do not attend these classes of spiritual deformation and show them, according to the traditional teaching of the Church of Jesus, the true face of Jesus and his Church yourselves.

UP

Let us read at first this extract of the Bull " Quo Primum " of Holy Pius V:

"... And that, in the celebration of the mass, they do not have the boldness to add or to recite the other ceremonies or prayers that those that are contained in this Missal.

Besides, by virtue of the apostolic authority, by the content of the present, let us grant and let us give following Indult, and it to eternity:

" That henceforth, to sing or to recite Mass in any church one can, without any reserve, follow this same Missal, with permission given here and power to make free and licit usage of it, without any sort of scruple or without one can incur any punishment, judgment and censorship... "

" So, then , as it is not, to anybody absolutely, allowed to break or, by rash begun, to violate. That if he had the boldness to infringe it, he have to know that he will incur the indignation of the almighty God and the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul. " ^39.

Paul VI did not have to oppose to all this heretical catechesis because it opened the way to THE WORST OF THE CRIMES WHICH HE HAD TO COMMIT, TO THE MOST SACRILEGIOUS ATTEMPT IN ALL THE HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIANITY: LITURGICAL REFORM BETTER KNOWN UNDER THE NAME OF " MASS OF PAUL VI ".

This new mass is, in the rite, completely against the catholic faith, it is a mutsy smell of the Protestant heresy. This new mass is heretical and sacrilegious, against the true faith, against the devotion, against the worship due to Our Lord.

In defiance of the holy laws of the Church, more particularly that of the Holy Council of Trent, Paul VI ordered a liturgical reform.

To be convinced of the change of faith, it will be enough to read the general Instruction of Novus Ordo Missae:

" The Synday Last Supper or the mass, is the sacred synaxe or gathering with the people of God meeting under the presidency of the priest to celebrate the Memorial of the Lord. That is why is in force excellently, for the local assembly of the Holy Church, the promise of the Christ: " There where two or three are gathered in my name, I shall be in the middle of them. " ^40.

We would not know how to imagine a definition of the mass any more heretical and apostate than that one. In this definition all the dogmae of the mass are denied, more particularly that of the transsubstantiation; the one of the physical presence of Jesus in Eucharist because, in the new " ordo missae " it is about a spiritual presence as asserts it the quotation of the article 7.

We know that Paul VI did not draft this text himself but he affixed to it his treacherous signature.

Let us see now what the Holy Council of Trent says of it:

" August sacrifice of the Mass is not only a sacrifice of praises and action of grace, or a simple memorial of The one that was offered on the Cross, but a true sacrifice of propitiation... If somebody says that the sacrifice of the mass is only a sacrifice of praises and action of graces, or a simple commemoration of the sacrifice of the cross... That it is anathema. " ^41.

" If somebody denies this surprising change and without example of all the substance of the bread in the body and from all the substance of the wine to the blood - then however that remain the appearances of the bread and the wine - conversion which the Roman Catholic Church calls excellently " transsubstantiation "; that it is anathema. " ^42.

And the Latin, (whose missals, formerly, gave translation in the language of the country) language of an exceptional beauty and a precision which protected in a so perfect way the purity of the Faith, essential language to preserve unity, was shamefully sacrificed under the false excuse of a better understanding and a bigger participation of the believers; having a "beautiful" result that most of the Catholics do not know any more today what is mass! It became for them a social meeting which takes place under the presidency of a priest who looks like a master of ceremony and who watches silly his believers getting lost in this godless cult, where the deified man tramples his sweet Saviour under foot and all this under the excuse of communication and brotherhood! No, the use of the Latin and the fact of reciting the words of the consecration in a low voice are not small details:

" If somebody says that the rite of the Church Roman, where one pronounces in a low voice a part of the consecration, must be condemned: or that mass must be celebrated only in popular language (of every country): That it is anathema. " ^43.

Luther and all the other heretics had to quiver with enjoyment by seeing this new "mass", they who all their life tried but in vain to destroy August Sacrifice of the Mass. Outside they could not arrive there, it was necessary that the traitor is placed inside the Church; such was the sinister role of Paul VI.

Read also these numerous statements which followed the appearance of the " Mass of Paul VI ". The brother Max Thurian of Taizé ( Protestant) speaks about fruits which is going to bring " new mass ":

" It will maybe that non-catholic communities will be able to celebrate the holy Last Supper with the same prayers as the Roman Catholic Church. Theologically it is possible. " ^44.

And this Protestant of Strasbourg:

" I was not able to find in the new catholic liturgy something which was able to shock me. " ^45.

It is to say that before, Holy Mass shocked him. And still this Protestant magazine which is delighted:

" New catholic eucharistic prayers dropped the false perspective of a sacrifice offered to God. " ^46.

To end with these statements, let us read that of the Superior Consistory of the Church of Augsbourg, Alsace and Lorraine after the meeting of Strasbourg the 8.12.1973:

"... We estimate that, under the present circumstances, allegiance in the Gospel and in our tradition does not allow us to oppose to the participation of the believers of our Church in a Catholic Eucharistic celebration.

The character of the celebration:

It is necessary however to act with a lot of discernment and wisdom. It would be necessary to accept the invitation of another Church only if we can, personally, recognize in this Eucharistic practice, the celebration of the Last Supper such as the Lord established it. Given the current forms of the eucharistic celebration in the Roman Catholic Church and because of the present theological convergences, many obstacles which would have prevent a Protestant from participating in the eucharistic celebration, seem in process of disappearance. It should be possible for a Protestant to recognize in the Catholic Eucharistic celebration, the Last Supper established by the Lord. In particular, we must take care into consideration the following points: the Evangelic character of the celebration in which the Protestant could participate must be obvious.

We like notably the communion under two species, not only by allegiance to the Gospel and to the reform, but because this practice opposes for us to a certain appearance of clericalism.

We like the use of new eucharistic prayers in which we meet ourselves and which has the advantage to shade the theology of the Sacrifice which we were in the habit of attributing to the Catholicism. These prayers invite us to find an evangelic theology of the Sacrifice. " ^47.

That can not be more clear; if they, Protestants, meet themselves and find the expression of their faith in the "mass" of Paul VI, how do you make, you Catholics who do not share Protestant faith, to find you there in this so-called mass?

Where were you Cardinal, Bishops, Priests at this moment so terrible in the history of the Church? Why did you keep silent? Why did you tell to your believers to obey? Of which right, by virtue of which authority, did you tell to them to attend this sacrilegious parody of the mass? Is it the fear to displease Paul VI, the fear of penalties, reprisals which motivated your obnoxious and treacherous silence? Or would it be that you had no more True catholic faith? We leave with God the judgment of such a behaviour.

And arrived, to crown this reform, the gestures of public denial by the permission of interreligious community. On December 21, 1966 at Assise, beauty queen Barbara Olsen ( presbyterian ) received the license of Paul VI to receive Communion in the mass of her marriage, without renunciation of her heresies. "^48.

The cardinal Samoré, following his master Paul VI, authorized on September 6, 1968 to Medellin (Colombia) the brother Giscard of Taizé ( Protestant), the Anglican bishop Reed, the lutherian minister Bahman and the ministers Green and Naylor, of the national Council of the Churches of the Christ to receive Communion in the mass of closing! Oh! We know that Paul VI regretted later the " opposite acts of inter-religious community in the just oecumenical line. "^49.

How it is distressing! Did we go a little bit too fast for him? And God, him, has no importance? "Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine " said Jesus (Matt.7,6). Holy are the Sacraments; swine is the symbol of those that separated from the Church and that profess a heretical doctrine.

But what there is more touching, it is that having moaned a little, PAUL VI named the cardinal Samoré, prefect of Crowned Congregation for the discipline of Sacraments, and, this, two months later!^50.

Oh! swamp with the hypocrisy! It was then an uninterrupt serie of bishops' official documents which allowed the " Inter-commmunions ", matter which could not be relaesed without the tacit approval, more or less, of Paul VI.

Here is! We think that we quoted enough facts so that every person of willingness looking sincerely for the truth can understand.

John-Paul II never stop crying out since its "election" only he wants to follow the tracks of Paul VI " his spiritual father ", he only wants to assume its inheritance.

To show to the reader that John-Paul II does not make better than Paul VI and that he continues only his work of destruction, a quick look over his first year of "pontificate" will be enough, we hope , to demonstrate to whom who want to know that, under the outside of a charming personality and a man apparently pious, hides a kidnaper wolf extremely dangerous. ^51.

March 12, 1979, John-Paul II granted an audience to the World Jewish Organization. In this occasion we would have been able to expect an exhortation of his part with the aim of bringing these members of the Jewish religion to the faith in Jesus Christ or at least to a declaration of principles without ambiguity in the divinity of the Christ. No, his speech turned so as to not strike them, to not disturb them in their errors, always this false excuse of the charity, this devilish 'charity' which leaves souls in their errors, encourages them, what is a dangerous mutsy smell of denial. Here is what he says:

" Dear friends... our two religious communities are strictly bound to the level of their respective religious identity... so close one to the other. "

St. Augustine says:

" The Ancient Testament contains the figures which had to disappear in the presence of realities brought by the Christ. And so it carried out Law and seers who carried that God had to give a New Testament. "^52.

No! Nothing binds us to the Judaism! Always in the same speech, John-Paul II wants that the Catholics " understand the difficulties which the Jewish soul, exactly soaked with one very high and very pure notion of the divine transcendence, feels in front of the mystery of the embodied Verb... "

It seems that for John-Paul II, "to understand" means silence; as if the embodiment of the Son of God did not give a so pure and idea so high of the divine transcendence. To keep silent, to deny Jesus, not to speak about the embodied Verb, well... not! Because the benefit of the souls can not be made by keeping silent about the truth, by being ashamed of Jesus Christ: He is the light, the truth, the salvation waited by Israel!

Though today, after so many proofs of the divinity of the Christ, the Jews always refuse to recognize Him; well, in spite of what John-Paul II thinks of it, it is difficult to understand.

And John-Paul II continues:

" Jewish and Christian we are all sure and obedient in God's will, the God of the patriarchs and the seers... Shalom. "

Here is again the Christ crucified, scorned, disdained, and, in one shot, put on the same foot of equality Jewish faith and catholic faith; as if it was possible to make God's will while denying his Son, while rejecting the salvation which God intended for mankind, as if God granted eternal life out of his beloved Son! My God, what a mystery of injustice, what a guile, what a treachery in a single speech. In which abyss of darkness and blindness these people fell, to deny so their Lord and master. St. Augustine says:

" Say so clearly that you do not believe in the Gospel because, by believing only in what is convenient for you in the Gospel, it is rather to yourselves than to the Gospel that you believe. "^53.

But it is not only the Jews: the Moslems also are so close to us that it should to wonder how the Roman Catholic Church, before the sinister council of Vatican II, was not able to notice it!

During the journey in Ankara John-Paul II did not find anything better than to go to bow before ATATURK's grave, responsible for the massacre of several thousands of Catholics! Certainly John-Paul II meant to imitate Paul VI in all; read the unthinkable, terrible speech that he pronounced in Ankara:

" The Moslems have as us the faith of Abraham in the unique(only), almighty and merciful God... Faith in God, whom profess the spiritual descendants of Abraham, Christians, Moslem and Jewish, when she is sincerely lived, when she penetrates into life, the dignity, the brotherhood and the freedom of the people and a principle of moral righteousness of the life in society is a foundation assured. And there is more; as a result of this faith in God Creator and transcending, the man meets himself at the top of the creation... The principle of a collaboration with the aim of a progress of the man, the competition in the good, the extension of the peace and the brotherhood in the free profession of the faith appropriate for each. "

Really he has some boldness, it is very cynical comedy that he plays. Let us rectify now the hypocrisies which contains this speech.

Our faith in God has nothing of similar in that of the Moslems. It is not our intention to give here a course on the Islamic religion but only to underline three points which will make you realize that our faith has nothing of fellow man with that of the Moslems.^54.

I) In the religion of Islam, fatalism is a "dogma", that is that God created some beings for the heaven and the others for the hell without these beings can not make anything for it.

Say to us, you, who have to teach the truth, where do you see, in this teaching of the Islam, faith in merciful God?

II) Always in the Islam, those that are elected do not go to the heaven to enjoy the beatific vision, no; the "happiness" of the elected members consists in the ownership of Éphèbes and Houris, with whom they will be able to satisfy eternally a bestial sensualism! Openly, the idea that John-Paul II makes of the Heaven is very low!

III) God is so powerful as He can make the contradictory, that means that from God can come the truth and the lie. Then, to assert that Christians and Moslem have the same faith in Almighty and merciful God is an heresy doubled with an execrable blasphemy.

Jews and Moslem are not the spiritual descendants of Abraham because Abraham is the father of the believers in Jesus Christ. The offspring which was promised to him it is that of all the believers, not of any religion but only the one that Jesus founded: catholic religion. The reader will read with a big profit this text of St. Paul:

" Not as though the word of God hath miscarried. For all are not Israelites that are of Israel: Neither are all they that are the seed of Abraham, children; but in Isaac shall thy seed be called(Gen. 21.12) ): That is to say, not they that are the children of the flesh, are the children of God; but they, that are the children of the promise, are accounted for the seed. "

( St. Paul to the Romans IX, 6-8)

" Know ye therefore, that they who are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing, that God justifieth the Gentiles by faith, told unto Abraham before: In thee shall all nations be blessed. Therefore they that are of faith, shall be blessed with faithful Abraham. For as many as are of the works of the law, are under a curse. For it is written: Cursed is every one, that abideth not in all things, which are written in the book of the law to do them. (Deut. 27.26). But that in the law no man is justified with God, it is manifest: because "the just man liveth by faith". (Hab. 2.4). But the law is not of faith: but, "He that doth those things, shall live in them". (Lev. 18.5).

Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written: "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" (Deut.21.23): That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Christ Jesus: that we may receive the promise of the Spirit by faith. Brethren (I speak after the manner of man,) yet a man's testament, if it be confirmed, no man despiseth, nor addeth to it. To Abraham were the promises made and to his seed. He saith not, " And to his seeds, " as of many: but as of one, " And to thy seed ", which is Christ. "

(S Paul to the Galatians 3 , 7-16)

And throughout this godless speech, the man is the centre, the preoccupation, the last end; Jesus, the doctrine, the Church are only cheap junk next to this modern god whom John-Paul II wants at all costs to serve, to cherish of sweet words, the god of Vatican II: the MAN. Let us continue, on June 14, 1979 addressing members of Rotary International, John-Paul II declared:

" Dear friends... By engaging more and more for the cause of the man, you will more appreciate the dignity and the incomparable greatness of the man as well as its real fragility. The Church is a resolute ally of all that work for the prosperity of the man. So, God supports Rotary International in the noble cause which is his. "

Here is a speech which seems very harmless but let us see what the True Roman Catholic Church thinks of " Rotary International " and what is exactly this association:

" One asked to this supreme congregation (Holy Office) if a Catholic could give his name to the association which carries the name of "Rotary Club?"

During the plenary session of December 20, 1950, émérentissimes and évérendissimes Cardinals proposed to the defence of the faith and the customs, on the opinion of the consulting (doctors) of the congregation, decided to answer: It is not allowed the clerks to give their name to the association of " Rotary Club " or to take part in their meeting: it is necessary to exhort the laymen to conform to what prescribes the number 684 of the Code of Canon law. And here is the no 684:

" That they avoid, on the contrary, the condemned, rebellious, suspect secret societies or those that try hard to escape in the legitimate surveillance of the Church. " ^55.

It is indeed there all the problem; because exactly the " Rotary " was founded in 1905, in Chicago by the lawyer Paul Harris and this one was then free-mason. ^56.

Under the cover of the mutual aid and the human dignity hides the most deceptive organization from the world: the Free-Masonry which has no other purpose than the reversal of the Roman Catholic Church and the institution of an universal religion under the control of a Jewish world government.

Let us remember ourselves the condemnation which carried the Pope Pius IX on this secret society; he declared excommunicated "ipso facto" the members in the sect and those that favor her.

John-Paul II knows all this and does continue his work. What is his speech otherwise than an incentive to this masonic sect, an incentive which he passes shamefully of being that of the Roman Catholic Church. Being so a part of those who favor a masonic sect, is he not, by the fact, even excommunicated from the Church? It seems although yes because in his case we can not plead ignorance.

What to say about his speech to the U.N.O.? It would be too long to analyze it completely; let us take only this passge which will be enough for those that are not voluntarily blind:

" The U.N.O... the supreme stand of the peace and the justice, authentic seat of the freedom of the peoples and men in their pursuit for better future... What can we wish furthermore every people and all the humanity? To all the children of the world, otherwise this better future or the respect for human rights becomes a full reality within the framework of the year 2000 which approaches.

Supreme insult to the beloved Spouse of the Christ, to the Christ himself who is the only one who can give peace, justice and freedom to the peoples as far as these submit themselves lovingly to His Holy Laws; because world peace is not God's peace. Except Jesus, peace, justice and real freedom does not exist; is only To him the author and the dispenser of these benefactions.

The U.N.O. is only a circus where are decided the most shameful and ignoble crimes against God, its Holy Laws, the Church and men .

What could wish John-Paul II, which is supposed to be a catholic priest? To find Jesus, to find light, true faith which, only it, gives a sense to the human life. His wish is of an atheist which thinks and worries only about the body and which believes the possible peace only by the only willingness of men.

PUEBLA... AND SPAIN... LIE... AND TREASON

Do you remember the journey to Puebla? His speeches against the theology of the liberation? Well! Everything was only facade, hypocrisy, because he signed the document of the bishops, document tainted with this perverse theology!

Long time ago, Paul VI had asked the catholic States to remove of their constitution primacy granted to the Roman Catholic Church which made Her the only legitimate religion in these countries. This demand of Paul VI constituted then a real treason. Spain, last catholic bastion, has just changed its constitution; of a catholic constitution quite directed to the respect for divine rights, she became an apostate constitution where God and the Holy Laws are scoffed and disdained.

A movement of protest rose in Spain; it is known under the name of " Fuerza Mueva "; it sent a delegation to Rome to ask the "Pope" to intervene. What made John-Paul II? Did he receive them as a father loving his children, he, who claims to love men? Did he welcome them, arms opened, as he welcomes the worst enemies of the Christ? No, he rejected them and ratified new concordat between Rome and Spain; shameful and ignoble treason!!!

It seems that in " the conciliar Church " the Charter of Human Rights has more importance and more value than the Holy Gospel of Jesus. The constant references of John-Paul II to human rights and to this masonic organization that is the U.N.O. are to shiver.

The Charter of Human Rights is the enemy of divine rights, the implacable enemy of the Universal Monarchy(kingship)of Jesus Christ. This devilish and masonic charter proclaims only the greatness of the man, king and centre of the universe before whom, everything, even God and the Commandments, has to bow, fade to give way to this monster that is the man who deifies himself.

How can the one who claimed to be a successor of Peter, constantly refer to this charter which carries a mentality and an ideology completely opposite to the Church of Jesus Christ and many times condemned by her.

But, as all the ones who are in the error and the blindness, John-Paul II manages there to contradict himself! This godless charter, these human rights, opposite to those of God, that he never stop to proclaim, put him, during a journey in the United States, in contradiction with himself, without he seems to have realized it!

Many feminists, laymen and nuns, would like to have access to the preisthood, and, it is in the name of the Charter of Human Rights that they demand that we allows them ascent the priesthood and that we stop oppressing them. They do not understand that the priesthood is a reserved vocation, in the divine plan, to men only, Sacred Law which the Church of Jesus Christ always maintained. But what answered John-Paul II these feminist lamentations? A completely incomprehensible answer:

" That the traditional position of the Church did not have nothing to do with human rights. "^57.

This answer, indeed, is incomprehensible for all what are filled, saturated by the "conciliar" spirit. They, these nuns whom we recycled to deprive them the least track of the sense of God, of the Church, of the Holy Tradition, do not understand why, suddenly, human rights do not have anything to do in the Church of Jesus: morality, discipline, liturgy; everything was upset, destroyed, plundered to please the man.

But for those who realize the terrible drama which strikes the Holy Church, there is, for them, no surprise to see John-Paul II contradicting itself. Because every man who is in the error, who does not follow Jesus, who does not submit himself to his Church, to its Holy Laws, can contradict himself some day because he has for master the world and its insane desires. Nevertheless Divine Master had warned us:

" No man can serve two masters at the same moment. " (Matth. 6,24)" And during this same journey, John-Paul II, did he not make a gesture of public denial by giving Holy Communion to a Baptist " Gustave Rhodes, at Des Moines, in Ioha "^58. without renunciation of his heresies. This scandalous gesture is completely against the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church according to the Canon Law:

" It is forbidden to administer the sacraments of the Church to the heretics and to the schismatic, even though they are honest and ask for it before, having rejected their errors, they are reconciled in the Church " (Canon law, 731 by. 2.).

" Perverse speachifiers, hollow and seducer plunged into the error and pulling to, resolved to ruin all the virtue of life which is by the Church, and to destroy radically God's Reign. " " Certainly, these people should be classified among the worst enemies of the Church. "^59.

UP

" In front of a such danger, the Roman Catholic Church could not keep silent and, in fact, it did not keep silent. The Apostolic See which has for mission the defence of the truth, the justice, all the possessions denied and fought by the Communism, the Apostolic See quite particularly, did not miss to raise voice...

Already in 1846, Pius IX carried a solemn condemnation, confirmed later in theSyllabus, against this fatal doctrine than we name "communism", radically against the natural right; such a doctrine, once admitted, would be the complete ruin of all the rights, the institutions, the properties and the human society itself. "

(Encyclical "Qui pluribus" 9.11.1846)

Later, Leon XIII, in his Encyclical " Quod apostolici muneris " defined the communism: " A mortal plague which attacks the marrow of the human society and which would annihilate it ". (23.12.1878). Communism is by its nature antireligious and considers religion as " the opium of the people. " ^60.

Paul VI refused to the Council Vatican II to condemn this ideology " intrinsically perverse " that is communism in spite of demands, even pleas repeated by several Fathers of the Council, particularly of the Cardinal Slyppyj, the former prisoner of the communist regime. Paul VI preferred to treat with this sworn enemy of God. Some thought that John-Paul II, who comes from a communist country, was going to condemn it! Other disappointment, he keeps silent as his master, he compromises, receives them in Vatican. And somebody does not come to us and say that, if he acts so, it is by fear of the reprisals which could be taken behind the iron curtain! All this is false and holds of the sinister hypocritical comedy that modernists play to the world.

The silence of John-Paul II, the cardinals, the bishops, the priests increases only the power of the communists who infiltrate, today , into all the countries and who are even positioned to the highest summit of this so-called catholic hierarchy. Do not illusion ourselves; today, even in the countries where reign this barbaric ideology, thousands of human beings are scoffed, imprisoned, tortured and put to death because of their faith.

John-Paul II which comes from Poland does not hear the shouts of his persecuted brothers? They call him for help, they beg that we make known in the whole world their executioners, that we denounce them, that we fight against these monsters which have the hatred of all which is divine. They moan in the bottom their prison and nobody listens to them, nobody raises voice, not even John-Paul II which seems deaf to the appeal of his tortured brothers. He prefers to make small curvets, compromises with these executioners who have from the human being only the appearance! Let this be understood: we will never be able to reconcile true Catholicism with the communism. They are two ideologies radically opposite. Catholicism, the true one, preaches in the world submission to Jesus, to his Church, to its Laws; communism preaches destruction, hatred of all which can call back until God's least recollection.

But all this will have to be paid, one day; all this blood poured into these countries, with shameful complicity of the " Church's clergymen ", will demand, a day, vengeance and it is the Lord Himself who will avenge these martyrs of the faith. He will avenge them for all what their executioners and of all what was made, by fear or by cowardice, by the accomplices of these abominable massacres.

Strengthen, Lord, all the ones who, for you, suffer persecutions; warm their hearts; give them force and courage to persevere till the end, firm in the faith, to receive, a day, of your hands the glorious palm of martyrdom!

BY ASSUMING THIS INHERITANCE , JOHN-PAUL II MAKES SO COLLUSIVE IN HERESY, IN APOSTACY, IN SCHISM AND IN SCANDAL. HE IS, IN FACT, SEPARATED FROM THE ROMAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH; HE CAN NOT BE HER POPE. Everywhere we try to present us John-Paul II as a traditionalist. Do not fool yourself here, his speeches sometimes traditional are made in a precise purpose and came from a hypocritical way to proceed that have modernists. By these speeches he only tries to increase confusion, to seduce souls better, to pull them in the paths of the schism and the heresy. It is a part of a plan for a long time prepared to destroy catholic faith in all the souls, if it was possible. Let us remember ourselves what said Holy Pius X about modernists:

" What will throw even more light on these doctrines of modernists, it is their behaviour which is fully consequent. According to what we hear from them, to what we read from them, we would be inclined to believe that they fall in contradiction with themselves, that they are oscillating and vague. Far from there: everything is weighed, everything is wanted in their side, but to the light of this principle that faith and science are the one and the other foreigners. Such page of their work could be signed by a Catholic; turn the page, you will believe to read a rationalist. Are they writing history, no mention of the divinity of Jesus Christ; are they rising in the sacred pulpit, they proclaim it highly. Historians, they disdain the Fathers and councils; catechists, they quote them honorably. " ^61.

Because, think well of it, where was Mgr. Wojtyla when Paul VI plundered everything? What did he make? Did he oppose? Did he protest? No, Monsignore Karol Wojtyla is a man of the reform; he is anti-catholic.

To end and to show that " this conciliar Church " is not THE Church, that was founded by Jesus Christ, read this confession of official APOSTACY of the spokesman of the archidiocese of Montreal, Abbé André Lamoureux:

" ALLEGIANCE IN THE CHURCH, IT IS IN THE CHURCH OF TODAY THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE IT, NOT IN THAT OF THE PAST. IT IS IMAGINARY TO TAKE REFUGE IN A CHURCH WHICH IS NOT ANY MORE. "^62.

Of which Church do you want to be a part? Of that of Jesus Christ or that of the Paul VI?

Up to you to decide!

UP

"The apostolic responsibility, to Us confided by God, in spite of our unworthiness, imposes us general care of the flock of the Lord. To keep it in the faith and to lead it in the way of the salvation, we owe in attentive shephard, take care of ceaselessly and to provide carefully to push aside from the sheepfold of the Lord those that, in our time, delivered to sins, confiding in their own lights, rebel with a rare perversity against the rule of the true faith and falsifying the understanding of the Holy Writings by subtle and vain quibbles, meditate tearing the unity of the Roman Catholic Church and the tunic without sewing of the Lord; if they disdain to be followers of the truth, they do not have to continue to teach error.

I) In front of the current situation so grave and so dangerous, it is not necessary that one can blame the Roman Pontiff for deviating from the faith; he is on the earth the Vicar of God and Our Lord Jesus Christ, he has the plenitude of the authority on nations and on realms, he is the universal judge and has to be judged by nobody on earth.

Moreover, more the danger is big, more the attentiveness must be complete and attentive so that the false seers, or even from other men, entitled in a secular jurisdiction, can take pitifully in their nets the simple souls and drag with them in the perdition and in the ruin of the damnation the uncountable peoples confided to their care and to their direction, to the spiritual as to the temporal; and also that we are never witnesses in the sanctuary of the abomination of the sadness announced by the seer Daniel, while we wish of all our power by means of God, according to our pastoral responsibility, to arrest the foxes who strive to plunder the vineyard of the Lord and to push aside the wolves of sheepfolds, not to look like dumb dogs incapable to bark, either to lose Us with the bad farmers, or to be compared with a hireling.

II) After mature consideration on this subject with our respectable brothers the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, on their council and with their unanimous approval, due to our apostolic authority, We approve and renew all and each of judgments, censorships and punishments of excommunication, suspense, forbids and hardship that promulgated and carried, in any way , against the heretics and the schismatic, all the Roman Pontiffs, our Predecessors - or considered as such - to by their extravagant letters or the Holy Fathers, or the Holy Canons, Constitutions and apostolic Prescriptions. And we want that they are observed in eternity and restored in full power, if need is it, and that they stay.

They are applying to all, up to here, who will have been taken on the fact, will have admitted or will have been convinced to have deviated from the catholic faith or to have fallen in some heresy or to have incurred schism or to have aroused it or committed. They apply also (but God likes to prevent it in his leniency and in his kindness to us) to those that, in future, will go astray either by falling in the heresy or by incurring schism, or by arousing them or by committing them, that one takes them on the fact, that they admit, or that we convince them of it.

WHATEVER ARE THEIR RANK, THEIR STATE, ORDER, CONDITION AND DIGNITY. IN VIRTUE OF THIS CONSTITUTION OURS, VALID FOR EVER, BY HATRED FOR A SO BIG CRIME, THE MOST GRAVE AND PERNICIOUS POSSIBLE IN GOD'S CHURCH, IN PLENITUDE OF OUR APOSTOLIC POWER, WE DECIDE, RULE, DECREE AND DEFINE... THAT SO EVER IT OCCURS THAT A BISHOP, EVEN HAVING OFFICE OF ARCHBISHOP, PATRIARCH OR PRIMATE: THAT A CARDINAL OF THE ROMAN CHURCH, EVEN LEGATE, THAT A SUPREME PONTIFF, BEFORE HIS PROMOTION OR HIS RISE IN THE CARDINALSHIP OR IN THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFICATE, DEVIATED FROM THE CATHOLIC FAITH OR FELL IN SOME HERESY, PROMOTION OR RISE, EVEN THOUGH THIS LAST ONE TOOK PLACE WITH THE UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF ALL THE CARDINALS, IS NULL, NOT HAVING OCCURRED, WORTHLESS, AND WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAY THAT SHE BECAME VALID OR THAT SHE BECOME VALID BECAUSE THE INTERESTED ACCEPTS THE RESPONSIBILITY, RECEIVES CONSECRATION, THEN ENTERS OWNERSHIP OR ALMOST OWNERSHIP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OR THE INAUGURATION OF THE ROMAN PONTIFF HIMSELF OR BY THE WORSHIP (HONORING ON BOTH KNEES) OWED TO BE RENDERED TO HIM OR BY THE PRESTATION OF VERY OBEDIENCE PRODUCED BY ALL OR BY SOME LAPSE OF TIME FOR THESE ACTS: ONE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD IT FOR JUSTIFIABLE IN ANY OF PARTS AND IT DOES NOT CONFER NOR CAN BE SUPPOSED TO CONFER WHATSOVER POWER OF SPIRITUAL OR TEMPORAL ADMINISTRATION TO SUCH MEN PROMOTED BISHOPS, ARCHBISHOPS, PATRIARCHS, OR PRIMATES RAISED TO THE CARDINALSHIP OR TO THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFICATE ALL THEIR SO-CALLED FACTS AND GESTURES,THEIR ADMINISTRATION AND ALL WHICH ENSUES FROM IT HAS NO VALUE AND CONFERS NO AUTHORITY, NO RIGHT TO ANYBODY. THESE MEN SO PROMOTED AND RAISED WILL BE, BY THE FACT, WITHOUT ANY ULTERIOR STATEMENT, DEPRIVED OF ANY DIGNITY, PLACE, HONOR, TITLE, AUTHORITY, FUNCTION AND POWER... "

"Lord, stay with us, because it is towards evening, and the day is now far spent "

(Luc 24,29)

UP

Have we the right to keep silent, in front of the harmfullness of the new post-conciliar religion and the new cult established in the Church of Jesus Christ as well as of the vacancy of the Apostolic See?

A problem arises among the traditionalists. A terrible confusion exists at present among them. This confusion is due to the Bishop Lefebvre's ambiguous position in front of John-Paul II. Bishop Lefebvre, even though he was never the leader of the traditionalists, has however a big influence in these circles: influence due to his bishop's title.

Let us be well understood: it is not question for us to want to throw discredit a bit on the founder of Écône. Certainly Bishop made a lot of work since the beginning of the catholic resistance in front of the heresy of the Church's clergymen since the Council of Vatican II. But the big lack of firmness in front of the so-called new "mass" and of the vacancy of the Apostolic See, is more and more prejudicial to the defence of the Faith by sowing confusion and division upon the traditionalists. Almost all the leaders line up in a unconditional way behind Bishop Lefebvre and adopt the law of silence in front of the heretical hierarchy.

Regrettably there is among them some who are not afraid of breaking this law of silence which they adopted in front of the "conciliar" Church to accuse " of ultra's and schismatic " the little numerous priests worldwide who have the courage to go to the end in the defence of the catholic faith by denouncing the agitators of heresies " whoever they are ", by exposing in a clear way, in the light of the traditional lernings of the Holy Doctors of the Church, why the Apostolic See is vacant since the heresy of Paul VI.

This situation is of the most unfortunate and it is time that all who have the responsibility of groups think seriously about the more and more pressing necessity of the defence of the faith without any compromise.

WHY THOSE THAT ARE NOT READY TO DEFEND OR DO NOT WANT TO MAKE IT DO NOT OBEY THE ONE THAT THEY RECOGNIZE AS THE LEGETIMATE POPE OF THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, WHATEVER REASON WHICH CAN MOTIVATE THEM TO CELEBRATE TRIDENTINE MASS. BY THEIR INCOHERENT AND UNJUSTIFIABLE POSITION, DO THEY STILL HAVE THE RIGHT IN FRONT OF GOD TO CELEBRATE HOLY MASS: WITHOUT DEFENDING HER AND WITHOUT DENOUNCING PUBLICLY THE " MASS OF PAUL VI? "

With the compromises which they make or which they are ready to make with John-Paul II, they are not any more true traditionalists BECAUSE THEY MAKE MUCH MORE HARM THAN GOOD BY THEIR EQUIVOCAL AND AMBIGUOUS BEHAVIOR AND BECOME ELEMENTS OF SUBVERSION AND DIVISION AT THE CATHOLICS WHO WANT TO REMAIN FAITHFUL TO THE PURITY AND TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE FAITH OF THEIR BAPTISM.

It is necessary, unfortunately, to denounce, today, this disastrous thought which seems to dominate in the majority of the groups which maintain true catholic cult here and there through the Province of Quebec. They pursue the fanciful dream of the "peaceful coexistence" of the true catholic cult next to the heretical cult of Paul VI.

It is for that reason that they adopted the rule of the silence. The priests steering these groups carry out the obligation to never denounce the agitators of heresies, schism and apostacy that became the Church's clergyman , no more than they dare to speak of the big and abominable sacrilegious of this so-called " new mass " established in the Church of Jesus Christ for more than ten years.

This new cult which is celebrated everywhere in our churches, goes out directly of the Protestant heresy and is in itself a direct attack carried in the true catholic faith. Under deceptive excuse of the charity, these priests keep silent not to hurt or to displease a hierarchy deprived of all the powers because they have betrayed their mission, which is to protect and defend true catholic faith, and to have put itself in the hands of the enemies of Jesus Christ and His Church. This hierarchy, having been separated of the Church of Jesus Christ by the heresy which she teaches itself, poisons the innocent and honest souls. This treacherous hierarchy pulls souls outside of the narrow path which leads to the eternal life by claiming to be able to lead them to it by the wide and spacious way which, until the arrival of this new religion, led to perdition.

For these priests who choose to keep silent instead of fighting openly, it is necessary for them not to oppose those that, in their group, have a foot in the new post-conciliar religion and another in the millennium tradition of the Holy Roman Roman Catholic Church, because some among these people attend the new sacrilegious mass over week and, on Sunday, migrating to the only true catholic mass (Tridentine mass). This position is the most execrable of all.

We estimate that such a behavior on behalf of the priests, in front of those that follow them is for them dangerous and excessively harmful to the defence of the true catholic faith. This behavior is absolutely against the true charity. Let us rather read these words of the Pope St. Pius X on the charity to our brothers:

" … NOW CATHOLIC DOCTRINE TEACHES US THAT THE FIRST DUTY OF THE CHARITY IS NOT IN THE TOLERANCE OF ERRONEOUS CONVICTIONS, HOWEVER SINCERE THEY ARE, NOR IN THE THEORETICAL OR PRACTICAL INDIFFERENCE FOR THE ERROR OR THE VICE WHERE WE SEE OUR BROTHERS PLUNGED BUT INTO THE ZEAL FOR THEIR INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL IMPROVEMENT … "

" This catholic doctrine teaches us as well as the source of the charity to our fellow-being is in God's love " " Quite other love is illusion or sterile and temporary feeling. "^64.

Some of them, down from the pulpit of the truth, even go so far as to say, maybe unconsciously, words as disconnected and illogical as this one: " Let us ask for the success of the apostolic missions of the Pope John-Paul II. "

Pray for the success of the apostolic missions of Jean-Paul II, is it not to recognize him as being the justifiable leader of the Roman Catholic Church, to admit that he does not teach error but true doctrine and that the Holy Church of Jesus Christ is not shaken by the schism, the heresy and the apostacy, which equals denying the reality.

In front of such an attitude, a question arises in our mind: what reason have these priests to disobey the one that they recognize as "pope" and how they can justify the fact that they refuse " the new ordo missae " by continuing to celebrate only true catholic mass. Is it not there a flagrant contradiction? We would be tempted to ask these priests: " HAVE YOU OBTUSE SPIRIT? HAVING EYES, SEE YOU NOT? AND HAVING EARS, HEAR YOU NOT. " (Marc VIII, 17-18).

Force is to conclude that, in such a situation, it seems that satisfaction and personal tranquillity of each go before the honor and the glory of God. In the drama that lives at present the Church, it is absolutely necessary to choose. Ambiguous behavior is inadmissible and despicable and we necessarily have to have the courage of the truths of our faith, although it can cost us.

The followers of "peaceful coexistence" hope that by their silence John-Paul II could, in a gesture of extreme generosity, to grant them the permission to celebrate true catholic mass in churches, existing present at an hour who would be fixed by the bishops of every diocese, with the evident condition that they never say a word against this sacrilegious parody that is this so-called " new mass " of Paul VI which, naturally, would be celebrated in these same churches for the faithful members of the majority party who prefer new heretical cult pleading, in their ignorance and their naivety, that this cult is better convenient for them, than they understand better, that they participate more and finally that they feel freed.

Some of them who favor the coexistence hope and go as far as believing artlessly that by means of time everybody would abandon new heretical liturgy. It is an utopian dream that this one and it is knowing very bad the mentality of the majority of the current world; mentality completely liberalized in all the domains and for a long time.

Go down from the clouds and get back on earth and look the reality such as it is and not the way as you would want it to be. What is exactly the peaceful coexistence between the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Protestant Last Supper that is the so-called " new mass " of Paul VI inside the same Church? The peaceful coexistence of two cults radically opposed one to another means putting error and the truth on the same degree within the Holy Church of Jesus Christ. In our opinion, it signifies the tacit acceptance of the freedom of cults, what is of the practical liberalism. The liberalism in doctrine and in faith being an heresy which includes in itself all the heresies, is intrinsically perverse and was always condemned by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. It is a sin against the catholic faith. St Augustin gives of the sin against the faith this indisputable formula:

"Noc est peccatum quo tenentur cuncta peccata".
"It is the sin which contains all the sins."^65.

For us, to accept such a compromise would be to make us collusive in the heresy, the schism and the apostacy in which fell the Church's clergymen since the reign of the anti-pope Paul VI and the application of the Council of Vatican II: council completely against the teaching which was given to us before by the true successors of Peter. True catholic faith does not change, it has never changed and will never change, it would be make insult for the Holy Spirit to claim the opposite.

It is necessary to think seriously, in front of God, before venturing into the road of "peaceful coexistence", even though we are of good faith because it often happens that with the best intentions which can exist, one manages to make grave errors. The end does not justify means. Every thing is what it is, nothing more and the best appearances cannot make good what is essentially bad. Holy intransigence does not admit any affinity with the error.

What do you think today of abominable right of citizenship which the Church's clergymen grant to the error in the heart of our holy catholic Faith?

Big will be, in front of God, the responsibility of those that, by word or by action, commission or omission, will have made themselves in a way or in anoother, the accomplices of this horrible fraud which exists in the Holy Church of Jesus Christ for many years already.

UP

?